Filmmakers
in sentence
792 examples of Filmmakers in a sentence
The
filmmakers
should hang their heads in shame, and as a result of disappointment, Elizabeth Wurtzel could probably make a bundle if she sued for "irrepairable emotional damages" as a result of the finished product.
The
filmmakers
apparently had enough money to be able to afford decent makeup effects, but not enough for a creature that would move around and attack convincingly.
I do not know what some of these
filmmakers
are thinking, by making the same type of clichéd film over and over, where the bad guys (bad girls in this case) win.
This movie doesn't have that excuse, it's stupid and cheesy because the
filmmakers
failed so miserably.
I really wanted to like this movie, because it is refreshingly different from the hordes of everyday horror movie clones, and I appreciate that the
filmmakers
are trying for something original.
There are some MST3K "targets" that were films whose concepts were so dippy they couldn't possibly have been good movies (like "The Green Slime"), and others whose basic premises could have been made into genuinely entertaining films if their
filmmakers
hadn't bobbled them in the execution.
I think the
filmmakers
here blew it from the get-go as far as casting: in a supposed remake, audiences would look for reflections of the hip, athletic Linc (Clarence Williams III), or the cool, with-it Michael Cole, and so forth.
What is it about drug addiction that so draws first-time
filmmakers
to offer their own take on the subject?
A by-the-numbers script with irritating lapses in logic and little historical accuracy--this isn't a documentary, of course, but the
filmmakers
could have at least TRIED for a little authenticity--and performances that range from grade B to grade school relegate this cheap little quickie to the 4:00 a.m.
The following year, she was discovered by some industrial
filmmakers
who had long wanted to produce a commercial feature.
This seems a strange course of action for the
filmmakers
to pursue, though, because it's unlikely that the (young) audience for a horror film of this quality either knew or cared who Veronica Lake was.
But despite the use of such strictly-for-shock effects, the
filmmakers
can't really cover up the fact that this is just a dull, low-grade Bronson vehicle.
The
filmmakers
obviously didn't know how to make the most of their low budget and the script seems as if it was turned out in one or two days.
EVERY person from Michael Caton Jones down should be banned from making films for 10 years; such is the insult this film is to real
filmmakers.
The
filmmakers
were clearly on drugs.
The thing that's truly terrifying about this is that the
filmmakers
thought they were making something intelligent and sexy.
What could have been some majorly creepy stuff ends up being an incomprehensible, nutty motion picture that even the
filmmakers
themselves probably didn't understand.
Well, if you enjoy laughing at the utter failures of filmmakers, then this one is for you.
"The neighbours would never know about this guy," one of the
filmmakers
says about Joel Edgerton's character.
Czech
filmmakers
were good 20 or more years ago.
I'd love to sit down and write an intelligent, well thought out review however, I feel I'd be spending more time in the writing process than the
filmmakers
did.
The creators of the movie had no intention to call the film "8MM 2." Originally, the film was called "The Velvet Side of Hell" but was changed at the last minute by Sony Pictures to 8MM 2 without letting the
filmmakers
have any say in the matter.
Stay Alive has a very similar story to some Asian horror films which include technology on the story.Some of this Asian horror films are One Missed Call,Ringu and Pulse.So,the idea of Stay Alive is very clichéd and obvious but the
filmmakers
behind it did not know how to put something new or interesting to the clichés in Stay Alive.This film is totally crap.But a very big crap.All the elements of Stay Alive belong to the worst class of ''horror'' films:shallow characters,nothing of suspense,stupid ''horror'' which makes laugh and light violence.It's easy to note that the ''director'' is incapable to create something original or disturbing.I do not wanna loose more time writing about this pathetic film.I just give you an advice:do not see this film.I really hated it.
What possessed the
filmmakers
to do this?
What these
filmmakers
have done cannot properly be called filmmaking; rather, they just chose sixteen students of some diversity (though not quite as much diversity as the reviews have suggested) and set them loose.
But in the end, as in "Far From Heaven," the
filmmakers'
good intentions are undermined by having a protagonist so ridiculously oblivious to the social conventions of their time.
As if the film wasn't already weak enough, the
filmmakers
turn parts of it into an idiotic "The Exorcist" rip-off.
Among the
filmmakers
that came out in the 80's and 90's Gus Van Sant is one of my idols.
Even though you knew it was a fake documentary going in you totally bought into the world the
filmmakers
created.
The sci-fi part of the film was very interesting and fantastic for its time, but i'm not sure if it was due to the fact it was shown directly after the Brilliant 1928 "The Wind" or if it seemed that Russian
filmmakers
take after what Russian novels are famous for (hundreds of characters, tangled plots) but I know for certain that the dramatic parts, as in the parts on Earth, made absolutely no sense, were boring and I became lost within about twenty minutes.
Back
Next
Related words
Their
Movie
Story
About
There
Would
Films
Other
Which
Think
Could
Really
Should
People
Making
Themselves
Movies
Horror
Something
Young