Viewer
in sentence
1694 examples of Viewer in a sentence
One flashback in a music store, where Richie has a crush on an employee stands out and really shows the
viewer
where this film could have gone.
This derivative erotic thriller remains watchable most of the way, mainly because a
viewer
is casually curious about how it will turn out, and because the director, Peter Hall, manages to stage a pretty hot (and quite bold) sex scene.
Whereas the
viewer
normally is shown page 95 in a 100 page script as the beginning of the movie, and then the rest of the flick is essentially explaining the ending, Five Fingers is dedicated to flashing back, which gets quite tiring by the end of the movie.
Potential viewers be warned, the current IMDb
viewer
rating for "Tomorrow at Seven" is an anomaly of low voter turnout.
The movie was a real "gotcha" for both the skeptic character and myself as a viewer, putting us in a very uncomfortable situation.
At which point this
viewer
perked up thinking this dull film was turning a corner into new world of kinkiness.
Unless of course the object was to totally confuse the
viewer.
The end being just as stupid as the entire movie mind you, and with absolutely no reward in it for the
viewer
what so ever.
After a few minutes of Cameron Mitchell's doctor character narrating about some patient of his, the
viewer
is tortured by no plot, pathetic writing, abysmally terrible acting, and an utter lack of cohesion and continuity.
If the
viewer
shuts-down his or her brain, he or she may like this forgettable TV movie.
Now that's fairly intriguing right there but unfortunately it all gets rather muddled and becomes so complicated that the
viewer
(like myself) will most likely become frustrated.
The cuts are so often and so fast, that the
viewer
often finds himself/herself wondering what just happened.
It is hard to envision how any
viewer
watching this film and not seeking affirmation of their GLBT lifestyle or wishing to see that of others affirmed, even through poorly realized drama, could appreciate Treading Water in any significant way.
What a waste of a 3D
viewer
despite somewhat decent 3D effects.
It's clear that directors Louis Leahman and William Sachs thought they were making something really shocking; but despite its best efforts, South of Hell Mountain is just too boring to shock the
viewer.
A nicely evoked 1930s setting provides much interest for a
viewer
in the early 21st century; unfortunately, "London Belongs to Me" has little else to recommend it besides lashings of quaint English charm.
I also agree with the user who commented that this filmmaker's narration-free style is the opposite of that of Michael Moore, but I don't agree that it presents varying points of view and invites the
viewer
to decide for him- or herself.
It's one thing to create a world which draws the
viewer
into feeling the tedium and angst experienced by the protagonist (which I think is what Zurlini was attempting).
And as far as "brutal", well, the
viewer
is brutalized the most with this here film.
Although I suspect there's nothing in this movie to spoil for a willing viewer, the plot is simply an excuse for male-to-female and male-to-male couplings set in the unconvincing context of a competition between a Parisian school for future CEOs and a major school for those seeking higher degrees in the liberal arts.
I thought I was going to view a somewhat classic horror film with a creative end that writers like to invent....that usually make no sense when writing a horror film, but as a viewer, we try to rationalize and understand.
The progression of their relationship is erratically presented and this, coupled with choppy editing, leads the
viewer
to be less than assured as to what is transpiring, motivation being almost completely ignored in the writing.
The film contained unnecessary scenes that confused the
viewer
rather than aiding them in understanding what was going on.
The good things first: I agree with another
viewer
who said that Gene Raymond has a marvelous drunk scene.
Evidently based on some actual incidents during WWII, the film just doesn't connect with the
viewer
for some reason that it is not quite clear to me.
This interesting directorial concept - to let the non-German speaking
viewer
just guess from "context" what the Germans are saying to each other - is, in my book, an utter flop and helps to lock the
viewer
out.
its a totally average film with a few semi-alright action sequences that make the plot seem a little better and remind the
viewer
of the classic van dam films.
the end plot is that of a very basic type that doesn't leave the
viewer
guessing and any twists are obvious from the beginning.
All the while watching I was hoping for that redeeming quality to make the
viewer
feel as though there is hope for the future, and there wasn't.
I know not finishing it is a bad review on myself, but it is the responsibility of the writer and crew to develope a story that will keep a
viewer
interested, and they failed.
Back
Next
Related words
Movie
Story
Which
About
There
Characters
Their
Really
Would
Character
Through
Scenes
Where
Think
Never
People
After
Should
Other
Could
