Example collocations logo

Warming in sentence

1698 examples of Warming in a sentence

This is hardly a sure-fire policy to solve global warming.
Now, he fears the withdrawal “undercuts our civilization’s chances of surviving global warming.”
The world is warming, and overwhelming scientific evidence confirms that humans caused most of that change over the last few decades.
Along with these risks, a few may benefit, especially from a little warming.
Continued high emissions of heat-trapping gases will lead to large amounts of future warming.
Ambitious efforts to control emissions can decrease future warming and its risks.
In explaining why he was abandoning the Kyoto accord on global warming, President Bush said: “We will not do anything that harms our economy, because first things first are the people who live in America.”
The leaders of smaller nations must also consider, in contexts like global warming, trade pacts, foreign aid and the treatment of refugees, to what extent they are prepared to consider the interests of "outsiders”.
Recent survey data by the Pew Foundation found that while 58% of Democrats believe that human beings are causing global warming, only 28% of Republicans do.
Such projects could be investments that would help limit global warming, or investments to equip the labor force for the digital economy.
Both symbolically and practically, the widespread backlash against the proposed fuel tax frustrates necessary and urgent efforts to combat global warming.
We know that the amount of greenhouse gases is rising due to our emissions, and we know that this is causing warming.
The most telling number here is the “climate sensitivity” – that is, the degree of global warming caused by a doubling of atmospheric CO2.
Polls of climate researchers, as well as analysis of thousands of scientific publications, consistently show a 97-98% consensus that human-caused emissions are causing global warming.
The past can serve as a guide to the consequences of the warming that we are causing.
But our solid understanding of the fundamentals of global warming – the base of our knowledge of climate science – should provide reason enough to press on with the implementation of carbon-free energy technologies.
With a rapid reduction in emissions, it is still possible to keep warming within safe bounds (estimated at below 2ºC); but the task is becoming increasingly difficult.
Everybody wants to prevent global warming, and the real question is: How can we do that best?
We should be open to other ways to stop warming – such as cutting carbon emissions in the future instead of now, or focusing on reducing emissions of other greenhouse gases.
Global warming will create significant problems, so carbon reductions offer significant benefits.
Each dollar would avoid $1.51 of global warming damages – a respectable outcome.
Taxing fossil fuels to reduce carbon emissions is a sensible part of the solution to climate change, but it is not the only or best way to prevent warming.
Moreover, although politicians focus nearly exclusively on cutting carbon emissions, CO2 is not the only gas causing warming.
And because methane is a much shorter-lived gas than CO2, we can prevent some of the worst of short-term warming through its mitigation.
Professor Claudia Kemfert of the German Institute for Economic Research (DIW) argues that spending $14 billion to $30 billion to reduce methane would create benefits – from the reduction in warming – between 1.4 and three times higher.
We could also put a bigger focus on reducing black carbon, considered responsible for as much as 40% of current net warming and one-third of Arctic melting.
The most pertinent question of all is: Why don’t we choose a solution to global warming that will actually work?
A Green Alliance With EuropeSANTIAGO/SAO PAULO – In December, world leaders will meet in Paris for the United Nations Climate Change Conference, which is expected to produce a new agreement to tackle global warming.
But, at a time when concern about global warming among citizens in both regions is growing, this is no time for indecisiveness.
When world leaders meet at the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Paris later this year to craft a response to the challenges of global warming, they should put in place policies to protect tropical forests and the people who make them their home.
BackNext