Example collocations logo

Warming in sentence

1698 examples of Warming in a sentence

The links between the loss of forest cover and global warming has been well documented.
And, although the political differences between them remain huge, delegates are nonetheless congratulating themselves for having the answers to global warming.
Data that didn’t support their assumptions about global warming were fudged.
Predictably, the text of the more than 3,000 purloined emails have been seized on by skeptics of man-made climate change as “proof” that global warming is nothing more than a hoax cooked up by a bunch of pointy-headed intellectuals.
Global warming is not a hoax, but at a time when opinion polls reveal rising public skepticism about climate change, this unsavory glimpse of scientists trying to cook the data could be just the excuse too many people are waiting for to tune it all out.
What seems to have motivated the scientists involved in Climategate was the arrogant belief that that the way to save the world was to conceal or misrepresent ambiguous and contradictory findings about global warming that might “confuse” the public.
So, too, is continuing to embrace a response to global warming that has failed for nearly two decades.
The ambassadors – who together represent about half of the world’s population – listened to climate change experts tell them that global warming is a vital issue and that the Kyoto Protocol could be used to tackle it.
The evidence led them to believe that proposed solutions to financial instability and global warming – while both important topics – are not the right investments to start with.
As for climate change, the election of a man who purports to believe global warming is a Chinese hoax created to damage American business is clearly bad news.
And the steady accumulation of incontrovertible evidence that global warming is real may slowly align the balance of US political opinion, and perhaps even Trump’s opinion, with the clear majority of Americans who believe that climate change is a major problem.
It is interesting to contrast global skepticism about free trade with support for expensive, inefficient methods to combat global warming.
Many argue that we should act, even if such action will have no benefit for the next decades, because it will help lessen the impact of global warming by the century’s end.
Moreover, if we could stop global warming (which we can’t), the benefit for future generations would be one-tenth or less of the benefit of freer trade (which we certainly can achieve).
More and more scientists are beginning to suspect that global warming has caused the radically changed patterns of precipitation now seen across China.
More than 2 billion of the world's 6 billion people live within 100 kilometers of a coastline, and so are vulnerable to ocean storms, flooding, and rising sea levels due to global warming.
Man-made global warming, caused mainly by fossil-fuel burning in rich countries, may well be a factor in the frequency and severity of major droughts, floods, and tropical storms.
The frequency and intensity of the El Nino cycle in the past 25 years may also be the result of global warming.
For example, investments in research on alternative energy systems that can limit global warming are vital;third, we should insist that our politicians agree to greater international environmental cooperation, lest the neglectful and shortsighted policies within each nation end up destroying the global ecosystem.
As the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change highlights in its most recent report, money is the key to addressing global warming, which means that any strategy must account for trends in green investment.
To be sure, developing countries would prefer that developed-country taxpayers foot the climate bill, given their countries’ disproportionate contributions to global warming.
The Changing Climate On Climate ChangeThe message, it seems, has finally gotten through: global warming represents a serious threat to our planet.
Europe and Japan have shown their commitment to reduce global warming by imposing costs on themselves and their producers, even if it places them at a competitive disadvantage.
I participated in the second assessment of the scientific evidence conducted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which perhaps made one critical mistake: it underestimated the pace at which global warming was occurring.
The Fourth Assessment, which was just issued, confirms the mounting evidence and the increasing conviction that global warming is the result of the increase in greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.
The increased pace of warming reflects the impact of complex non-linear factors and a variety of “tipping points” that can result in acceleration of the process.
If he were truly concerned about global warming, how could he have endorsed the construction of coal-fired electricity plants, even if those plants use more efficient technologies than have been employed in the past?
But claims by Bush that America cannot afford to do anything about global warming ring hollow: other advanced industrial countries with comparable standards of living emit only a fraction of what the US emits per dollar of GDP.
Some in Europe worry that stringent action on global warming may be counterproductive: energy-intensive industries may simply move to the US or other countries that pay little attention to emissions.
The Kyoto Protocol represented the international community’s attempt to begin to deal with global warming in a fair and efficient way.
BackNext