Example collocations logo

Warming in sentence

1698 examples of Warming in a sentence

(By the way, what happened with global warming this year?
Anyone can yak about global warming, it's a fashionable topic and a good way to make money.
Total waste of time, left-wing propaganda, global warming film.
I went onto IMDb, saw the 10 star ratings and read the vast amount of reviews in which people described this film as 'heart warming'.
If you have not been reading news and do not know what is global warming doing to our planet, or where do polar bears live (besides the zoo), or how walruses look like, then perhaps this show will benefit you.
This isn't academy award winning by any standards but it is a descent heart warming story that kids and adults alike can enjoy.
The "Yes men" are kin to the creationists and global warming skeptics.
I can't see the point of discrediting actual issues by mixing them up with spiritual goofs and use eccentric fanatics as front figures for let's say global warming.
It is a heart warming film and I highly recommend it.
Filmed for television as a cautionary tale about the impending global warming disaster, "The Fire Next Time" is a disaster unto itself.
A heart warming and funny, bitter-sweet story with high-octane entertainment; Shouf Shouf Habibi enriches the viewer with insight into the struggle of a traditional Moroccan family trying to integrate into Dutch society, while maintaining their "identity" as well.
Sorry, not my idea of a heart warming story.
I remembered only the end and figured if global warming was to happen, Baltic would become the new tropics.
The dialogs are hard hitting, sensitive and heart warming.
In terms of global life expectancy, total world wealth, the overall level of technology, growth prospects in emerging economies, and global income distribution, things look rather good, while on still other dimensions – say, global warming or domestic income inequality and its effects on countries’ social solidarity – they look bad.
Beyond the Two-Degree TargetBERLIN – In international climate-policy circles, there is broad consensus regarding the target of limiting global warming to a maximum of two degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels.
Those of us who live on the front lines of climate change – on archipelagos, small islands, coastal lowlands, and rapidly desertifying plains – can’t afford to wait and see what another degree of warming will bring.
Climate-change deniers – those who refuse to believe the science of human-induced global warming – continue to dismiss any such effort to stem the rise in the planet’s temperature as futile and unnecessary.
It does not mean that previous climate models were excessively alarmist, or that we can take a more relaxed approach to reining in global warming.
But it is just one paper; there is still a lot more to learn about our capacity to limit global warming.
Increased investment to retrofit the economy for global warming would help to stimulate economic activity, growth, and job creation.
The basis of this conclusion is that warming of this magnitude may make much more warming inevitable.
Similarly, as the frozen Siberian earth thaws, it releases methane, a powerful greenhouse gas that accelerates global warming.
Carbon-dioxide emissions have been growing fast, fossil-fuel resources are being depleted rapidly, and global warming has accelerated.
But the day is fast approaching when fires, droughts, and storms exacerbated by global warming will dwarf our ability to respond.
The case for reducing carbon dioxide emissions – and slowing the rate of anthropogenic warming – grows stronger with every new catastrophe.
For example, researchers have linked global warming to extreme heat waves – such as the ones recently experienced in California, China, Japan, and South Korea.
While domestic issues might be uppermost in voters’ minds, Harvey, Florence, and other extreme weather events have made global warming a local issue and placed it squarely on the ballot.
Paris is Not the SolutionCOPENHAGEN – President Donald Trump’s withdrawal of the United States from the Paris climate agreement leaves the US without a global warming policy.
Abandoning the Paris agreement does not risk our planet’s future, because the agreement itself does little to solve global warming.
BackNext