Versions
in sentence
504 examples of Versions in a sentence
Of course, the "miracle" in all three
versions
of 19th-Century British domesticity is that the "girls" were all "spinsters" and their only realistic brushes with "men" were their vicar father and their wastrel?
Now, I'm not familiar with that book or the other film versions, but I am a big fan of Cain's Double Indemnity (much more so than I am a fan of Billy Wilder's film version of it, in fact).
The implant and colon scenes also have uncut
versions
that are on the special features and it's a shame the producers made them chop 'em, so to speak.
I've always enjoyed Kenneth Branagh's
versions
of the Shakespeare classics, as he always does a very good job, but in this movie, the one who lifts the whole movie, is none other than "the-always-great-actor" Laurence Fishburne.
Clips from the Wembley concert are interspersed with surrealistic sketches such as nuns gorging themselves at a garden party as Marc Bolan performs some acoustic
versions
of Get It On, etc. (I'm still learning the song titles).
This trend even spread into horror features, with titles like Blacula, Blackenstein and Sugar Hill serving up blaxploitation
versions
of monster standards.
This scary and rather gory adaptation of Stephen King's great novel features outstanding central performances by Dale Midkiff,Fred Gwynne(who sadly died few years ago)and Denise Crosby and some really gruesome gore effects.Director Mary Lambert has a wonderful sense of visual style,and manages to make this one of the few
versions
of King's work that is not only worth seeing,but genuinely unnerving.The depiction of the zombie child Gage(Miko Hughes-later in "New Nightmare")is equally noteworthy,as what could easily have been a laughable character is made menacing and spooky.As for the people,who think that this one isn't scary-watch it alone in the dark(eventually with your squeamish girlfriend)and I guarantee you that "Pet Sematary" will creep you out.Some horror movies like this one or "The Texas Chain Saw Massacre" shouldn't be watched in group.Recommended for horror fans!
It's amazing the amount of effort that went into the detail, particularly recapturing the feel of the 1960's era, the Batcave set, Wayne Manor, the costumes, and the actors selected to play the younger
versions
of West, Ward, Burgess Meredith, Cesar Romero, and Frank Gorshin!
That being said, they are not my favorite screen
versions
of Lord Of The Rings, and let me explain why.
Other
versions
have blown it, but this gets it right.
In Spain at the time, when there was nudity involved, the filmmakers shot two versions, one with clothes and one with out.
Besides who I just mentioned, there's also frog or fish
versions
of Cab Calloway, Fats Waller, Joesphine Baker, Bill "Bojangles" Robinson, and Louis Armstrong.
It's kind of sad that even our cable channels don't have the guts to show unedited
versions
of this gem (your loss, Comedy Central).
I would say if you want to see the show in its original version, see the video
versions
on VHS.
Anyway, both
versions
are good,but anyone that loved Austen's books, should watch this movie.
The two
versions
I've seen were dubbed (English and French)but the actors appear to speak their own language not just Italian so there is a synchronization problem.
The flimsy plot isn't meant to be taken seriously - why else make Merlin a heavy when in most, if not all, of the other
versions
he is more a friend/mentor to Arthur - so if you start wondering aloud why Sir Lancelot who has been sold to historians as the epitome of chivalry and uprightness metamorphoses into a schoolyard bully you're not going to get much fun out of what is essentially a fun movie.
OK - as far as the 2
versions
of this movie.
Several
versions
of the story emerge and merge as Cox flashes jump cuts and twisting title cards amid effects and emoting.
There are some songs on the show that were not on the album, and some of the songs on the album were studio
versions
of the same songs on the show.
I have seen 4 versions, Orson Welles is still my favorite Mr R , though George C Scott did very well and it's a toss up between Joan Fontaine and Sussanah York, although they were both a bit too old for the role.
This is, in my opinion, much better than either of the 2 1990's versions, but is still not all that good.
The earlier
versions
of this film were unable to give the animals any real personality or motive, which is done perfectly here.
Available in R and X (!) rated
versions.
However, good to hear the full
versions
of all the songs (although 'Step in the right Direction' is still absent) and the moments of magic in this film still shine through.
If we're really luckily, it will include comparisons between the 2
versions.
In the middle 1950s two film
versions
of Hugo's best remembered novels appeared and disappeared very quickly in movie houses.
Both films were actually quite good, and were the best straight
versions
of the novels to try to get most of the stories onto the screen.
Thenardier is an even slimier villain than Javert is, but Javert's single minded pursuit of Valjean in the novel makes the antics of Thenardier look secondary, and they are usually dismissed in the filmed
versions
(though not in the musical version).
I have seen the 1995, 1986, 1973 and 1939
versions
of A Little Princess and, of all of them, this is my favorite.
Back
Next
Related words
There
Other
Different
Their
Movie
Version
Which
People
Story
Three
Better
Original
About
Would
Years
Where
Really
Several
Could
After
