Example collocations logo

Talent in sentence

2172 examples of Talent in a sentence

Starr is over the top in his Mexican gardener role with the pigeon English speak and English accent and his natural comedic talent is misused.
The overall ineptitude of this film and the monumental waste of talent does warrant some kind of perverse redeeming value to it however.
He is the last person that I would ever expect to do a cameo in the movie and I don't think his talent was wasted or misplaced.
I thought the trailer looked great and the acting talent involved really is quite impressive: Julia Ormond, Richard Harris, Tom Wilkinson, and Gabriel Byrne.
Gus Van Sant was one of few of his generation with the ability, talent and desire.
The musical numbers are simply stunning, often hilarious, and leave you exhilarated at the exuberant talent on display.
The film's opening number "I'm Taking a Shine to You" poses the question - why didn't Ann Miller become a bigger star - she had the looks, personality and the talent.
The Lon Chaney character gives Cagney an opportunity to show his range, and the depth of his talent.
Not a whole lot of talent, mind you, but that's not what we're looking for in exploitation, is it?
I think there's an abundance of talent in the country and certainly there's definitely film makers of real talent who have produced moments of real quality.
And not unlike other disaster movies there is vast and varied talent featured in the cast: Sharon Lawrence, Jennifer Garner, Fred Weller, Lisa Nicole Carson, Rachel Ticotin and Cicely Tyson.
Dakota Fanning is a very special young actress, perhaps a greater talent at her age than Drew Barrymore.
She has some of the most incredible talent at age 14.
Clearly loaded with talent, in my opinion at least most of his movies have been disappointments.
When a film boasts a cast list comprised of some of the most talented Hollywood actors in Bill Murray, Tim Robbins, Martin Landau, and Toby Jones, not to mention newcomer and extraordinary talent Saoirse Ronan, it will most likely go one of two ways: Either the film deserves such a fine cast and will be a great film (take 'The Departed' (2006) for example) . . .
Then we come to his two movies with the Beatles - and here I am well aware I am treading on sacred ground for millions of admirers of the lovable mop - tops,but basically they were a rag - bag of gimmicks based around pointing his camera at the boys while they did their schtick.He got lucky and rode on their coat tails ,as did many another lesser - talent.
They had as much acting talent as a blind man calling balls and strikes.
The acting could have been good -- I choose to believe this because the bad directing so completely overwhelmed any performance talent that evidence of acting ability is completely undetectable.
It's an insipid, implausible, and uncompelling film that wastes a lot of prime MGM talent.
Even people who have no artistic talent or interest in the arts would be impressed with this movie.
If there ever was a case in point to make about Gangster/film art in history, L.G.F. would be one of 3 cases to put forward, the other 2 being,Get Carter & Layer Cake: I cant see why other IMDb-ers have commented on futility's such as, water running backwards in the swimming pool, when what you have here is the making of two screen idols, coupled with the teaming of probably the greatest film making talent in our history.
Absolutely no creativity, no originality, and no talent went into the making of this film.
This show ranks at the bottom of Adult Swims talent along with 12 oz mouse, Tom meets the mayor and a few others I can't remember.
Julie Warner is a good match for him in looks and talent.
However, this is a good film if you can manage to open your mind and revel in its utter crapulence, so many plot holes, such little acting talent, bad costumes, bad props, bad sets, bad sound, you will wonder exactly how it was possible for someone to make such a rubbish film?! Furthermore, every time I have watched the killing edge I am left feeling utterly depressed, there are no high points to the film whatsoever.
International product financed through the Canadian Film Development Corporation (which would explain the mostly Canadian-born voice-over talent, including John Candy, Harold Ramis, and Joe Flaherty) and distributed stateside by Columbia.
"Double Agent 73" is an amateurish and inept movie, yet there is an honesty about its amateurishness and ineptness: you get the feeling that the people involved didn't want to cheat you, they really did try to make an espionage / action movie, they just lacked the talent and budget required.
First being why you should not let an actor of questionable talent write, produce, and star in his own film.
Its very perplexing to me why an actor with his immense talent and underrated potential ends up in crapsack projects like this.
The music was very good and the story that most touched me was that of Kaspar Weiss the little boy with so much talent and such a weak body.
BackNext