Style
in sentence
2648 examples of Style in a sentence
The movie still shows a lot of mistakes, errors and is by the way made in a really cheap style, especially the sets were cheap and unconvincing, the palace looking like some villa, the city itself looked like..well like a cheap set.
There is the obvious point when Jason looks like he wants to give up, but don't worry, all characters that despise Marty help out in the final operation, and with Jason's parents coming, he wants to finally prove his truthfulness, and boy does he deliver, big
style.
Sometimes a first time filmmaker, full of the vigor that comes with getting a thumbs up or two from fellow film students, goes headlong into
style
that is way too disjointed, unsure, and dramatically frustrating that the personal side of the story, the extremely personal side, gets smudged in the purpose of telling a good story.
The dialog is comic-book style, and it's the supporting cast which ends up floundering trying to make it work.
Bette Midler (who is in just a few scenes and acts the old Countess part in a broad, grinning style) doesn't have any context in this version.
I realize a period piece is expensive to make, and that this
style
of shooting (close framed shots to camera, moving camera, wide aperture shots, washed-out) allows such films to be made for a price.
As a style, it has advantages and disadvantages like any other, it allows more period pieces to be made.
Secondly...whats with all the glancing to the left and then to the right??? they even do it in synchronous
style.
I was half afraid that this would be another in that
style
even if it treated another subject/aspect of the same subject.
Any horror fan should be insulted by this type of direct to video work that is void of ANY skill or
style.
I thought, wow, this is going to be a winner, freakin' Natural Born Killers
style.
Thats the problem with this film, if you want to make a T2
style
movie, then do it properly.
He even gets bazookered and survives the T1000
style.
Although its plot is taken from the history of ancient Rome, 'Caligula' is not made in the
style
of sword-and-sandal epics like 'Spartacus' or 'Gladiator'.
(That
style
of movie-making was out of favour in the late seventies).
But this film was awkward in its direction, preachy in its style, exaggerated in its acting, and overly politically correct.
(Of course, she was eleven when this film was made, and a number of years away from her seeming decision that she would
style
her acting after early Helen Mirren: steamy looks and little clothing.)
All I can say is, this movie is made for the Lifetime Channel on TV, which means no solid characters, no particular style, weak acting all kinds of suggested sex but no-breasts and tushs (because boy, that would just catapult the film into the depths of sleaze wouldn't it?)
Where's the style, the foreboding, and the charm?
A few drops in
style
could be spared to the public, such as the patisserie drag (Charm and aesthetics of cooking plus sensual payload of sweets, see Chocolat, Babette's lunch, Vatel etc.) Hammam and the Fairies are definitely more truthful, seems that Ozpetek has learned the tune of Italy in the early 2000s and is humming along... I'll give him a last chance though...
The directing of the actors is very loose, even for Dogme
style
movies, and results in poor undefinable acting.
I was fairly lenient with my review of Holocaust due to some actual attempt at a statement and style, but in Ferox's case there is no reason to watch this unless you solely get off on blood and gore.
While POTEMKIN excelled in its editing style, this movie used similar techniques with a lot less finesse--in some places, the editing seemed very choppy and amateurish.
It has the same kind of visual style, the same quality of acting, direction and writing.The film was a big hit at home territory, but wasn't sold anywhere else outside Holland and Belgium.
This makes it difficult when trying to decide whether I view this film as an example of unique
style
in film making, or just another low budget, poorly put together film.
There is no character development whatsoever, the plot is a garbled mess, the
style
is nonsensical, the shot selection is appalling, and the editing is worse.
I first heard of it in one of those Medved
style
movie books, "The 50 Worst Movies Ever" or "The Golden Turkey Awards", or something like that.
Save yourself the trouble and rent Shirley Temple movies, it's a lot better than watching Orr try and recreate Shirley's acting
style.
Jo was more Dean's
style.
That's because although it has some nice camera-work and style, the film is hopelessly dull and uninvolving.
Back
Next
Related words
Movie
Which
There
Their
About
Great
Films
Really
Would
Story
Other
Acting
While
Movies
Could
Where
People
First
After
Characters
