Should in sentence

40487 examples of Should in a sentence

Should one of them stop working or reduce hours to be home?

Or should they both change their practices so they can have much more flexible schedules?

And what criteria should they use to make that decision?

If breadwinning and caregiving are really equal, then why shouldn't a government invest as much in an infrastructure of care as the foundation of a healthy society as it invests in physical infrastructure as the backbone of a successful economy?

So as parents and partners, we should be socializing our sons and our husbands to be whatever they want to be, either caregivers or breadwinners.

We should be socializing them to make caregiving cool for guys.

But I've come to believe that we have to value family every bit as much as we value work, and that we should entertain the idea that doing right by those we love will make all of us better at everything we do.

Simply insert part A into slot B, and we should all be good to go.

So going back to our biological minds, then, we might think that females should choose to have sex with the guys that have the shorter appendages, because she can use her time for other things: avoiding predators, taking care of young, finding and ingesting food.

Our research does not suggest that criminals should submit their MRI scans as evidence in court and get off the hook because they've got a faulty amygdala.

So even in its imperfection, the growth of the Chinese internet should not be dismissed, and it's worthy of our closer examination.

Wherever this alternative fuel exists, be it in China or Africa, Southeast Asia or the American heartland, we should endeavor to follow it with capital and with effort, driving both economic and societal impact all over the world.

But this was an awful tragedy, and it shouldn't have been so difficult just to try and find out who was responsible for those deaths.

Because in an age when there is so much information out there in the open, why should this crucial information about company ownership stay hidden away?

Why should tax evaders, corrupt government officials, arms traders and more, be able to hide their identities from us, the public?

Why should this secrecy be such an accepted business practice?

We've learned we should distribute control to smart parts.

But when I think about it, this isn't the question that we should be struggling with.

There are things that shouldn't be done, and decisions that were being made in secret without the public's awareness, without the public's consent, and without even our representatives in government having knowledge of these programs.

These aren't the people that we want deciding what the role of corporate America in a free and open Internet should be.

CA: What more should they do?

I'm not sure that's what an intelligence agency should be aiming for.

CA: Ed, one response to this whole debate is this: Why should we care about all this surveillance, honestly?

People should be able to pick up the phone and to call their family, people should be able to send a text message to their loved ones, people should be able to buy a book online, they should be able to travel by train, they should be able to buy an airline ticket without wondering about how these events are going to look to an agent of the government, possibly not even your government years in the future, how they're going to be misinterpreted and what they're going to think your intentions were.

So we should be suspicious about the same sort of overblown claims of damage to national security from these kind of officials.

We shouldn't be threatening dissidents.

We shouldn't be criminalizing journalism.

Journalism is not a crime, communication is not a crime, and we should not be monitored in our everyday activities.

There's really no question, the principles that have been the foundation of this project have been the public interest and the principles that underly the journalistic establishment in the United States and around the world, and I think if the press is now saying, we support this, this is something that needed to happen, that's a powerful argument, but it's not the final argument, and I think that's something that public should decide.

And now we use Johnson's No More Tears, which we probably should've been using right from the very beginning.

Related words