Science
in sentence
4134 examples of Science in a sentence
But if you believe the way
science
is taught, and if you believe textbooks, you're liable to have the following schema of research.
It stands guard at the boundary between the known and the unknown, because in order to discover something truly new, at least one of your basic assumptions has to change, and that means that in science, we do something quite heroic.
We all have an inner critic that kind of guards what we say, so people don't think that we're obscene or crazy or unoriginal, and
science
is full of the fear of appearing unoriginal.
Soon enough, after this, I started being invited to give talks to thousands of scientists across the world, but the knowledge about the cloud and saying "Yes, and" just stayed within my own lab, because you see, in science, we don't talk about the process, anything subjective or emotional.
And I saw scientists in other groups get stuck without even having a word to describe what they're seeing, and their ways of thinking narrowed down to very safe paths, their
science
didn't reach its full potential, and they were miserable.
I'll try to make my lab as creative as possible, and if everybody else does the same,
science
will eventually become more and more better and better.
That way of thinking got turned on its head when by chance I went to hear Evelyn Fox Keller give a talk about her experiences as a woman in
science.
And she asked, "Why is it that we don't talk about the subjective and emotional aspects of doing
science?
You see,
science
seeks knowledge that's objective and rational.
That's the beautiful thing about
science.
But we also have a cultural myth that the doing of science, what we do every day to get that knowledge, is also only objective and rational, like Mr. Spock.
And when you label something as objective and rational, automatically, the other side, the subjective and emotional, become labeled as non-science or anti-science or threatening to science, and we just don't talk about it.
And when I heard that, that
science
has a culture, everything clicked into place for me, because if
science
has a culture, culture can be changed, and I can be a change agent working to change the culture of
science
wherever I could.
And so the very next lecture I gave in a conference, I talked about my science, and then I talked about the importance of the subjective and emotional aspects of doing
science
and how we should talk about them, and I looked at the audience, and they were cold.
Since then, every conference I go to, I give a
science
talk and a second, special talk called "Love and fear in the lab," and I start it off by doing a song about scientists' greatest fear, which is that we work hard, we discover something new, and somebody else publishes it before we do.
It makes us afraid to talk to each other, which is no fun, because we came to
science
to share our ideas and to learn from each other, and so I do a blues song, which — (Applause) — called "Scooped Again," and I ask the audience to be my backup singers, and I tell them, "Your text is 'Scoop, Scoop.'"
And scientists have gone on to form peer groups where they meet regularly and create a space to talk about the emotional and subjective things that happen as they're mentoring, as they're going into the unknown, and even started courses about the process of doing science, about going into the unknown together, and many other things.
So my vision is that, just like every scientist knows the word "atom," that matter is made out of atoms, every scientist would know the words like "the cloud," saying "Yes, and," and
science
will become much more creative, make many, many more unexpected discoveries for the benefit of us all, and would also be much more playful.
As post-Enlightenment creatures, we tend to assume that scientific thinking holds the key to everything of importance in our world, but the world of value is different from the world of
science.
But what impressed me even more was that as I was waiting for my digital I.D., one Googler was telling me about the program that he was about to start to teach the many, many Googlers who practice yoga to become trainers in it, and the other Googler was telling me about the book that he was about to write on the inner search engine, and the ways in which
science
has empirically shown that sitting still, or meditation, can lead not just to better health or to clearer thinking, but even to emotional intelligence.
It's an art at the frontier between art and
science.
And a museum, a
science
museum.
I am a computer
science
and engineering professor here at Carnegie Mellon, and my research focuses on usable privacy and security, and so my friends like to give me examples of their frustrations with computing systems, especially frustrations related to unusable privacy and security.
So we found that the passwords created by people affiliated with the school of computer
science
were actually 1.8 times stronger than those affiliated with the business school.
Why should be believe the
science?
The fact is, many of us actually don't believe the
science.
So why should we believe the
science?
Well, scientists don't like talking about
science
as a matter of belief.
In fact, they would contrast
science
with faith, and they would say belief is the domain of faith.
And faith is a separate thing apart and distinct from
science.
Back
Next
Related words
Fiction
About
Technology
Which
There
World
Their
People
Would
Other
Years
Think
Could
Should
Research
Climate
Where
Really
Social
Engineering