Reviews in sentence

1639 examples of Reviews in a sentence

Believe me I've seen some bad "emperor's new clothes" films but the one thing I can say for them is at least they were well shot and well made while the camera wobbled during two scenes in this! Read all the other reviews - avoid at all costs and don't talk about it.

Frankly I'm rather incensed that on the basis of the dazzling reviews attributed to Steven Smith I wasted nearly two hours on his debut offering.

I just saw this movie yesterday...I cannot believe the reviews on this site.

I have read several good reviews that have defended and critised the various aspects of this film.

I'm working in a movie theater and in DVD Shop and the success for this movie was similar in both areas: At the movies it was a nice (but no big at all) success during the first two weeks but then, when the reviews of those who have seen it were not too good, the movie dropped very fast.

Several of the reviews I've read showered praise on the work of director Steven Soderbergh while ignoring the actors almost completely.

I like to keep my reviews short and simple, but this pretty much sums it up.

Funny thing is, most of these rave reviews sound like they're coming from the same person, or at best a small, coordinated group of "Open House" groupies.

Hilarious, huh? No, please, if you never listen to anyone's reviews, please do here.

Anyone whose read a few of my reviews can see that I'm pretty easy to please.

Before seeing this movie, please check out reviews available on the internet regarding the movie's falsification of events, particularly its prevarications regarding the widely accepted fact that 7-8,000 Muslim men were bused out of Srebrenica and shot by Serbian paramilitaries.

Please watch this movie critically, and read reviews beforehand.

Most reviews argue that the documentarian takes his arguments too far, even if he raises questions that target the conventional wisdom regarding the war.

I read a couple of good reviews on this board for "Mr.

Casting aside many of the favorable comments that have obviously come from friends and/or relatives that pepper this and many other low budget independents listed on IMDb, one is lost when it comes to using these reviews as an accurate gauge.

But even more surprising was the reasonably good reviews that a couple of Canadian newspaper critics gave this film.

I'm writing this review to counteract the positive reviews given, which unfortunately convinced me to give this movie a try.

As I was waiting another review (for Derrida) of mine to pop up, i decided to check out old reviews of this awful movie.

Look at all the positive reviews.

Sometimes we find a real gem, but many times we find that the film we've just spent our hard earned money on is nothing more than a putrid steamer made worse by the completely undeserved rave reviews and film fest awards listed on the box.

You really should check the reviews for that movie instead of this one.

I have read a lot of reviews that defend the film as being important to Australians because of the subject matter.

It's a fitting movie for that time slot since it's really hard to follow and quite odd (see the other reviews for specific story info).

I almost never comment on movies, but I saw the 5 glowing reviews of this "movie" and decided I had to weigh in with my own review.

I won't waste your time with the plot, you may read other reviews.

I remember when this was in theaters, reviews said it was horrible.

Several reviews state that this film is a spoof or tongue-in-cheek horror movie, it is neither.

I don't know if the positive reviews for this flick were a joke or what.

These reviews that claim this movie is so bad its good are going way overboard with that one.

I read many reviews which said 'thriller not a horror movie'.

Related words