Rating in sentence

1503 examples of Rating in a sentence

I really, really don't understand how that movie could get a rating bigger than 4 here on IMDb.

Ellen Barkin gives a respectable performance as the lead detective, and Julian Sands provides unintentional laughs as a cross-dressing psychiatrist, which is why it escapes a one-star rating.

its interesting to note that at this date, there have not been enough votes to give this film a rating out of ten, yet there are dozens of comments that rave about the film.

The movie itself is rather unbelievable and juvenile in its plot (did I spell Juvinile right??) I noticed a comment from another reviewer who has given The Box a 10 rating, who was derisive in his comments on other reviewers who gave the movie a 1 or 2 rating and couldn't spell.

I don't think I've hated a movie so much in a while, how this movie has even a 6.6 rating is beyond me.

I saw the MST3K version of this film and it is a bad movie - but its not nearly as bad as its low IMDB rating (currently 1.8 out of 10).

I give "Flashdance" a lowest rating of 1 out of 10 because it's nothing more than a series of music videos with a movie short surrounding the music videos, in order to clock in as a feature length film.

The rating must have come from the man who wrote this drivel because the only suspense in this movie was whether I would finish it or not.

I would have given this LESS than a 1 rating if it were possible.

I was debating between this movie and 2012 but chose Inglourious Basterds due to it's amazingly high IMDb rating.

I can't believe what this rating says for the gory and violent tastes of the modern masses.

With that in mind, it really shouldn't be compared to blockbuster features and my rating would be higher.

But, the main reason I like this film, is fake or not when the ghosts start attacking & kidnapping them,I get chill-bumps every time & have to look behind me as it feels like something's there with me.i know it's my imagination, but hey more than half of the drivel that is horror in today's cinemas & DVD's doesn't give me goosebumps,so that makes this a creepy delight.Not for everyone, as skeptics will hate it & not for gorehounds as with a PG-13 rating there is no gore.

I don't usually write reviews here but after seeing a couple of people gave this film a good rating (must be cast/crew) I felt I had to say my piece to save anyone from accidentally hiring it or wasting their money on buying this cack.

It's too bad we can't give zeros as a rating; this one really is not worth even a consideration!!!

I gave this movie a rating of 1 (awful) only because there were no minuses in the drop down list cheers.

I had to lower my rating of this movie to a 4 due to the terrible sound track.

I can't imagine how anyone could justify rating this movie higher than a five.

Why the R rating includes 'sexuality' is beyond me.

A landmark in bad cinema, and one of the few, few movies I've seen that REALLY deserve the lowest possible rating: no stars!

I don't understand how the rating system works.??

I didn't even bother to watch Iron Eagle III, but from looking at the R rating, I assume it's more violent than the past 2 movies.

I give it a 2 - I reserve a 1 rating for Guy Ritchie and Woody Allen films.

it seems like if you are going to post here it going to be a 10 star rating ,nobody ever seems to dislike anything ,well i am honest, some don't like that but here we go, rachel ray show is just plain awful.!!!!!!, this show reminds me of the snl character linda whatever if she had a cooking -whatever show.i

The film revolves around impersonation (which seems to be in the curriculum of every comic star!) - in this case a German officer - and, while not as bad as Leonard Maltin claims (awarding it a BOMB rating), it's not exactly classic stuff either - certainly leagues behind Chaplin's THE GREAT DICTATOR (1940), even if comparably narcissistic!

If there was a ZERO rating, I'd give it, but I guess I'll settle for a generous 1.

Also, for you guys out there who like nudity in your movies, don't be fooled by the R rating.

OK - I gave it a "3" just because they obviously had no money to make this film, but I feel it might deserve the "2.3" rating it had when I got here.

I'm actually helping to raise it's rating, despite being bored for the last hour and a half.

Though I would have to agree with them on the surroundings, they simply aren't rating the movie as a whole... they are infatuated by the surroundings but miss the overall review.

Related words