Example collocations logo

Quality in sentence

4328 examples of Quality in a sentence

The dog is well trained and cute, making it the only redeeming quality in this never-should-have-made-it movie.
The quality of the movie is okay, sound okay, no hiss, colors okay, black is black and not blue as in many low budgets.
The film quality was cheap; the soundtrack was muddy; the editing was ridiculous.
Perhaps the poor lighting and gag-worthy film quality were attempting to cover up how bad-to-the-tenth-power the makeup was.
Fortunately, the powerful performances by Huppert and Dutronc dramatically improve the overall quality of the movie, which miraculously gains the depth and humor.
One can appreciate the artistic quality of the film (it's obvious that the filmmakers cared deeply about this film) and its rich cinematography, but the film still tries too hard to be different and then gives up and whimpers to an end without making much of a statement.
The film quality is grainy.
The sound quality is grainy.
Even the film and sound quality was terrible.
It was fresh at the time and held a sort of edgy quality.
But once I took the DVD home from BBuster, I was shocked at the awful production quality, acting, directing of this completely amateurish piece of garbage.
The CGI creatures are TV-level quality, which means you know you're watching cartoon monsters.
But Hallmark stands for the best, quality films.
Just by calling a film a Hollywood venture doesn't guarantee quality cinema.
However, I am a great fan of A.A. Milne's books which are very subtle and hide a wry intelligence behind the childlike quality of its leading characters.
A professional production with quality actors that simply never touched the heart or the funny bone no matter how hard it tried.
The quality cast, stark setting and excellent cinemetography made you hope for Fargo or High Plains Drifter but sorry, the soup had no seasoning...or meat for that matter.
the best thing about the film (and it is actually worth seeing just for this) was the art direction - the film has an amazing intangible quality to it.
It is such a shame when actors and actresses of high quality get involved with pure crap, probably because they were offered a great deal of money.
This movie was horrible from all aspects: poor script (even accounting for a children's G-rated movie), poor production (the jittery camera shots made me feel nauseous for the first ten minutes), poor acting (perhaps they were "directed" to act cartoonish), and even poor sound quality (there are parts where the audio level seems fine, then you can't hear what the next actor is saying).
Other points to note are the quality of the sound and picture but this is forgiveable as it's obvious money was a major problem in the making of this film.
(one joke about Garth's eyes fertilizing the audience was good... the rest i can hardly remember...) it feels like a poor quality "Knowing Me, Knowing You."
If this film received a total overhaul, with picture quality enhanced, add new dubbing to the badly dubbed voices and added a nice unobtrusive background music then this film would truly start to take shape.
I am seldom motivated to write a review unless inspired by the quality of the movie.
The quality of the movie is ultra bad, seems like it was made in the 20ies.
It is incredible that such a TV series of low quality can be sustained for 5 years.
The monster effects look awful and the picture quality makes it feel like you're watching a home video or a public-service announcement.
The fact that this movie is bargain basement quality is a real shame, but back in the 1940s, that was about the only type of film made for theaters catering to Black audiences due to segregation.
I liked Sandlot (I) and I generally like stupid and silly movies but this movie doesn't have a single redeeming quality.
If you actually look at it in prospective the actors are the same quality of this movie.
BackNext