Example collocations logo

Quality in sentence

4328 examples of Quality in a sentence

The stunts with the Concorde are worth watching for the laughs, although the special effects aren't as terrible as I'd expect for a movie of this quality made in 1979.
The DVD for this film is by Alpha Video--a company that almost always releases the poorest quality prints.
despite the really corny title, the horrible quality, the terrible actors, and the cliché writing, i think this movie isn't the worst i've ever seen.
The only redeeming quality of this movie is that it's so terrible it's almost funny, especially the part where Patrick Swayze's knight character goes home to his Knight father who has retired after losing his legs and is now bed-ridden in his armor for the sole purpose of letting the audience know he was a knight.
But there are just some people almost incapable of creating quality.
Are we as horror fans so used to horror films being so utterly bad these days, that when one comes along that has some, and i repeat 'only some', redeeming quality's, we get much too excited and give a rating that is just a wee bit too high?
I can agree that the movie is not "Armageddon" or "Deep Impact" quality.
The filmmakers had good intentions, but the overall quality of the direction and production value was obviously lacking a great deal.
The Ghastly Ones could have been better if the quality of the film was better but still better then other films of the time like Schoolgirls In Chains.
I have seen previous movies from Cédric Klapisch, and therefore expected a quality movie with psychological depth.
Actually it really is much better quality than a lot of b movies.
Very poor quality and the acting is equally as bad.
Every thing about this movie is great, the acting in this film is of true quality; Master P's acting skills make you actually believe he is Italian!
this movie was really bad. it has that quality that a lot of indie movies have: moments of humor filled with long spaces that are completely boring.
A shame, given the quality of the acting talent on offer - Joan Plowright, Claire Skinner, Steven Macintosh all deserve better than this.
First, they ruin it with the uniquely bad animation quality, then, they get voices that sound nothing like the original.
The original had actors who had done quality (non-disaster) films before, but this one uses actors who have done the disaster movie circuit already (Blakely, Kennedy, Wagner).
Quite apart from any consideration of the film's quality, this was the absolute height of nearsighted arrogance and stupidity on the part of the producers and their attorneys.
My rating of 3/10 may have more to do with my disappointment with the film than its actual quality or entertainment value.
The cinematography is below the quality and innovation of that exhibited by the worst made-for-TV movies, the acting is awful (although I get the feeling that the fault for that lies squarely in the lap of the director), and speaking of which, did I mention the direction is so haphazard and inscrutable that it defies the definition of the word?
I have done home movies and they are oscar quality compared to this huge mass of Dookie.
Sound quality was dire and the first female character had a very thick Spanish accent although she talked utter nonsense anyway.
Having expressed that, I have no problem with the quality of the acting or the actors in this film.
The film has no real visual quality as it's set entirely in the Sanitarium and it's grounds which is basically just a big bland house in the middle of nowhere.
Seriously, when a movie has Gabriel Byrne, Jamie Foxx, Thandie Newton, Stuart Townsend, Hal Holbrook, Melanie Griffith and Sylvester Stallone in it you would expect some quality.
The only good reading of the character I've heard was done for radio by Amanda Root, who gave it the same quality as she did the character Anne in the film of "Persuasion": a stern, sure, heartfelt moral centeredness.
Since I am required to give you a ten line statement of why not to watch this movie, let me just say there is absolutely no redeemable quality to it.
Poor picture quality, poor sound, poor acting and definitely not based on actual facts.
But let us remember that even spoofs can have quality.
Obviously we weren't going for quality, but for air-headed entertainment and gross-out gags.
BackNext