Piece
in sentence
4291 examples of Piece in a sentence
Not like this
piece
of junk.
I hate to see such a
piece
of garbage being done using the name of the Island.
An appalling
piece
of trash.
But the nagging question remains..what sort of wood was that pier support made of if a rotten
piece
of it pulled off didn't float?
It should be plagiarism for them to use Batman's name for this
piece
of crap.
Mad Magazine may have a lot of crazy people working for it...but obviously someone there had some common sense when the powers-that-be disowned this waste of celluloid...the editing is el crapo, the plot is incredibly thin and stupid...and the only reason it gets a two out of ten is that Stacy Nelkin takes off some of her clothes and we get a nice chest shot...I never thought I would feel sorry for Ralph Macchio making the decision to be in this thing, but I do...and I REALLY feel bad for Ron Leibman and Tom Poston, gifted actors who never should have shown up in this
piece
of...film...at least Mr. Leibman had the cajones to refuse to have his name put anywhere on the movie...and he comes out ahead...there are actually copies of this thing with Mad's beginning sequence still on it...if you can locate one, grab it cuz it is probably worth something...it's the only thing about this movie that's worth anything...and a note to the folks at IMDb.com...there is no way to spoil this movie for anyone...the makers spoiled it by themselves...
This is indeed the only way to describe this appalling, trashy
piece
of stand-up.
The new score is quite bad(though the new "setting traps
" piece
was, if nothing else, interesting and different), especially compared to the grand score of the first, and the almost-but-not-quite-as-good score of the second.
I shudder to think what people must have thought of environmentalists after viewing this
piece
of overbearing, preachy cinematic trash.
Please, please, please, don't waste your time on this
piece
of junk; if you must, wait and rent it.
I seriously thought that Herbie Fully Loaded was better than this
piece
of poopie.
I went to see this film with fairly low expectations, figuring it would be a nice
piece
of fluff.
Nothing much to say other than how thoroughly appalled I was at what a blatant
piece
of American historical revisionist propaganda it is; and starring Susan Sarandon of all people!
From the mind of Harry Alan Towers comes another
piece
of cinematic sludge.
You have Jennifer Beals on the one hand who is polished, professional and totally believable, and on the other hand, Ri'chard, who is woefully miscast and just jarring in this particular
piece.
But when I saw the movie, I could not believe what a dull, sour, joyless
piece
of junk it was.
Alone in the Dark is essentially the same kind of a spirit as Resident Evil, so of course, there is the slight hope the director will manage to have some
piece
of a brain enough to make a horror movie and not an action movie.
For the life of me I can't understand the good reviews on this
piece
of crap.
What can I say, this is a
piece
of brilliant film-making that should have won an Oscar.
But this
piece
of nonsense - words fail me.
I believed all the hype surrounding this
piece
of work, about the trials and tribulations of 6 people, living in Mexico City concerning their sexual lives.
Along with Sidney Poitier and Katherine Houghton these four brilliant actors made a great cultural statement with Director Stanley Kramer's 1967 master
piece.
What we're shown is a propaganda
piece
with a lot of finger waving and pointing.
I won't talk more about this movie, except for one little
piece
of advice : Do not go see it, it will be a waste of time and money.
OK every kibbutz had just a small
piece
of something shown in the film (like youngsters raiding the kitchen at night) but you can't show the whole kibbutz as being full of all those - shall we say - naughty traits.
It's a lousy
piece
of crap.
The visual look - including the animation - gave a wonderfully unnerving air to the
piece.
It seemed that the plot was shoe horned in at irregular intervals giving a stuttering effect that detracted massively from the flow of the
piece.
I'm afraid the whole
piece
came across as, at best, a 'reasonable first attempt', by a teenager who has spent far too much time reading DH Lawrence.
To further confuse things, a little further in, out of nowhere, they actually do about 15 minutes of sung-through dialog, then seem to drop that idea and move on to other things, such as a number that begins in a jazz club with a drummer and two electric guitars suddenly turning into a fully orchestrated
piece
with a massive unseen string section.
Back
Next
Related words
Which
Movie
There
About
Would
Could
Little
Paper
Trash
Other
Garbage
Great
People
Really
Their
First
Should
After
Where
Think
