Example collocations logo

Mostly in sentence

3026 examples of Mostly in a sentence

are 1 or 2 mildly amusing moments,but mostly it's just silly,without being funny.this
Sometimes the music and dancing can save such a movie, but this one contains mostly snoozers and losers.
"Play It Again, Sam" was directed by Herbert Ross (mostly known for chick flicks, such as "Steel Magnolias", "The Turning Point" and "Boys on the Side"), but it's a typical Woody Allen film.
It's a very dark, mysterious movie set mostly at night.
Wayne is first billed, but the cast is mostly ensemble.
The plot is paper-thin, the jokes are mostly lame, and even the very young are likely to get bored well before the end.
The competent but mostly unimaginative direction is by Howard Koch (though he does stage a pretty exciting chase sequence involving a NYC transit bus).
The sequence where the train was blown up was filmed on The Bluebell Railway in Sussex mostly because the filmmaker was given the track without disturbance from visitors.
Or maybe that Karl focuses strongly on the negative sides of our society, mostly of them he feels unable to change.
Strangest of all, in the end, all the characters' (mostly) minor transgressions are punished, but the real criminal gets off scot free.
By the third season, the producers and everyone else involved (sans the actresses) figured that because the ratings had not slipped, then the success of the show had nothing to do with quality, because the third season's episodes were mostly not very good, sometimes pretty bad.
Some of the scenes unspool without editing for several minutes, the camera mostly still, sometimes moving with the action but never on the whim of the filmmaker.
The actors are also mostly to be rated B, the series wasn't very challenging anyway.
So these three girls are outcasts, because they smoke but mostly because they are infantile.
Gremlins benefits a little from the fact that I grew up with it, but mostly I liked the sequel and since then I've realized the original is better.
Cheap (and I mean CHEAP; I don't know what they paid the actors, but the rest of the budget must have been around 50 dollars; it was shot on KODAK film stock!) softcore thriller is mostly talk, with minimal horror elements and a monotonous performance by Monique Parent.
The same linguist who had done my favorite translation of the play (Helen Cooper, the Methuen Drama Translation) also did the screenplay, so naturally, I expected something mostly faithful to the script.
OK, I started my search with Brasil, and I'm tellin' you I wasn't disappointed at all, I was lucky to find very good movies like Tieta do Agreste, Four Days in September, and Central Do Brasil, I switched to Argentina by advice of few friends, I started with this movie,(Burnt Money) supposedly historical what I found was, a melodrama, some good acting, but mostly a lot of bad acting, the set up of the period was well done, but somehow the whole movie was centered in the period or in the robbery, instead I attended to a disgustin' gay melodrama.
Ving Rhames takes a paycheck, Freddie Prinze Jr. demonstrates the limitations of his acting abilities, and the script tries to simulate the coolness of the "insider" but serves mostly as the embodiment of its own title, providing easy targets for ridicule.
I was so utterly disgusted and horrified (mostly because it was billed as a "comedy"), I never wanted to see it again.
To sum it up right away : as far as I'm concerned , the script is very lame , plot is full of highly unbelievable events , dialog is clumsy and doesn't sound convincing at all , acting is mostly bad , story is plagued with one stereotype after another , there is not enough gore , violence and perversion to justify this pathetic , unimaginative exercise in bad cinematography ... I'm not saying that everything in this movie sucks , but it's mostly garbage .
I had heard mostly bad things about it but decided to give it a try anyway.
The acting is mostly high school level and the music is really lame.
Lastly, I loved all of the homages to 80's camp slashers (mostly Friday The 13th).
It's mostly because of the actor Rupert Everett who is very good in this roll.
The make-up of the 'humanoids' is too neat and tidy as well; they mostly look like variations of Lon Chaney Jr.'s Wolf Man or the aliens in 'Star Trek,' animal faces and perfectly-coiffed hair.
"Night of the Scarecrow" is a typical horror movie from 90's.The production is slick and polished,the acting ranks from acceptable to lame and the special effects are mostly cool.There are some graphic gore scenes,so the gore-hounds will not be disappointed.It's a decent movie however I prefer earlier "Scarecrows"(1988,William Wesley),which is not only gory,but also creepy as hell.In conclusion,this is sometimes nonsensical,but quite enjoyable picture so you should give it a chance.
Besides, Hollywood is such an obvious and all-too-easy target, and this sort of thing has been done a zillion times before, and mostly much better.
His movies are mostly hit-or-miss gag machines, but this is one of his movies in which nearly every gag works.
This one feels mostly like Nightmare on Elm Street though, but done incompetently.
BackNext