Example collocations logo

Makers in sentence

864 examples of Makers in a sentence

Also it seems as if the makers on this film were struggling to fill 90 minutes.
a movie that attempts to be far smarter than its makers are capable of producing.
I felt that "The War Tapes" and "Blood of my Brother" were much more fair and let the viewer draw some conclusions of their own rather than be beaten over the head with the film makers viewpoint.
Why do movie makers always go against the author's work?
Let's just say it in simple words so that even the makers of this film might have a chance to understand: This is a very dumb film with an even dumber script, lame animation, and a story that's about as original as thumbtacks.
To any aspiring movie makers out there in the Philippines: You do not have to stoop this low to make money.
I'm sure the makers hoped it would somehow inspire another Laurel and Hardy revival, but you can't inspire interest in the past with a shallow and unfunny caricature of what made the original so appealing.
The special effects were decent (and I will say the film makers did a good job making the ship eye-pleasing), but IT even has several major flaws.
It's not just that this is a bad movie; it's not only that four of the "best" Mexican movie makers are in this film; and it's not only that the script is terrible.
If the makers of this film really wanted to sway people to christianity and show what it means to truly believe, they would have used the money to help people truly in need.
American film makers decided to make a film they think is Japanese.
Shame on the makers of this film for capitalizing on his faults and not his greatness.
Instead the film makers tried to make a serious thriller/horror movie, and they completely missed.
This film should serve as a lesson to all past, present and future film makers...when you have a film as successful as the original "Corpse Grinders" was you should probably leave sleeping dogs lie and you should definitely not try to revitalize it over twenty years later (unless you have the financial backing to pull of a superior sequel such as Herschel Gordon Lewis did with "Blood Feast 2: All U can Eat") Even if you do decide to do this you should probably spend a little bit more money than you did on the original and for god's sake...NEVER film a movie onto video...why do film makers even attempt to do this when everyone knows the quality is going to turn out hideous...I personally have yet to see one film made in this fashion that's even worth the powder to blow it to hell...if you can't afford to make a sequel that is better than your original film then sell the rights of the film to someone who can...and what was Ted V Mikels thinking about (or smoking) when he wrote this god-awful script?
It goes back and forth between sock puppetry and animation throughout, probably because the film makers couldn't afford live actors.
So yes,we do have a microcosm of British society here,but perhaps not in the way the makers of "In which we serve" intended.
The makers of this movie filmed in the tree covered hills of Ontario and moved the whole event to a non-existant town called Blainsworth.
I just can't understand why the makers did this because they obviously had the rights to the story and could have made far more money (FAR!) by telling straight.
The makers of the film obviously wanted to capture some of the out there craziness of other films of the time, but fell a long way short.
The revelation of the killer is quite funny because the makers really seemed convinced that it was an original twist... It's not, guys! "Splatter University" is easily one of the worst horror-turkeys ever.
The makers couldn't be more evasive about the actual origin of this gigantically over-sized critter!
The makers of this movie should be band from ever making another movie.
I hope the makers of this crap have day jobs because this film sucked!!!
It is so boring, bad played and in nearly every detail stolen from "BLAIR WITCH PROJECT" that you can't believe the makers take this serious.
Unlike the makers of this movie, who would have been better off throwing all the cash spent making this movie into a bonfire - that would have been more entertaining.
Whenever the storyline becomes too tedious, the makers luckily enough always insert a near-brilliant Christopher Walken moment to distract you.
who paid money to have this script made into a feature film?" Well Jigsaw is not that kind of film, instead of asking how this garbage was budgeted you wonder why the makers were shot out of a cannon into the sun.
didn't know anything about the film or that it was based on a best selling book.Tried guessing from the opening scenes what it would be about,best guess,buried treasure and a death list.That lasted about 15 minutes when i got the sneaky suspicion that the film was crap.I'll not bore you with how bad the plot and acting were but anyone who gave it more than two stars must work for the film makers.I watched until the hero jumped into his corvette to rush to the hospital.He had his on his suit,shirt and tie arrived at the hospital in jeans and a t/shirt.Couldn't even get the continuity right.
I guess little girls should aspire to be nothing more than swimsuit models, home makers or mistresses, since that seems to be all they'll ever be portrayed as anyway.
There basically is no story, it's hard to believe that the makers of this film thought that this cheesy soap opera crap would be taken seriously as actual historic fact.
BackNext