Example collocations logo

Losers in sentence

496 examples of Losers in a sentence

Trump’s presidency has revealed an alternative perspective: globalization, at least as currently construed, tilts the balance of political power toward those with the skills and assets to benefit from openness, undermining whatever organized influence the losers might have had in the first place.
To bring the losers along, we will need to consider changing the rules of globalization itself.
The world could continue to close its eyes to global warming and hope for the best: a slightly warmer climate that produces as many winners (on the Siberian, Northern European, and Canadian prairies) as losers (in already-hot regions that become hotter and dryer), and that the Gulf Stream continues warming Europe, the monsoons are not disrupted, and that the Ganges delta is not drowned by stronger typhoons.
Or perhaps we are hoping that the “we” whose interests are taken into account when important decisions are made will not be the “we” who are among the big losers.
But sound economics should also have told us that there were bound to be losers as well as winners, with the losers – and potential populist voters – often concentrated in the same smaller towns and rural areas that form the backbone of the gilets jaunes movement.
Just about the only thing we can say with some certainty is that there will be winners and losers.
Political leaders plead impotence, intellectuals dream up implausible global-governance schemes, and the losers increasingly blame immigrants or imports.
Thatcherism plus globalization had many liberating consequences, but the combination also created new social problems, begetting losers as well as winners.
This indicates we should be willing to spend perhaps 20% of trade benefits on helping the losers from trade deals, through job training and transitional social-welfare benefits to ameliorate the risks.
The only losers would be the 25,000 rich farmers who currently divvy up $3-4 billion in government handouts each year.
Fortunately, the government did not attempt the impossible task of trying to separate winners from losers.
But some pushback conceivably could be warranted if the advanced economies – which have already created an informal contact group of “China losers,” including representatives of the European Union, Japan, and the United States – are right that China has been engaging in unfair trading practices.
Enlargement will not be cost-free: there will be losers, as well as winners.
But the common dilemma facing all sides in this negotiation, the ins as well as the outs, is to make sure that there are not too many losers in any one country.
The first decisive consideration will be the operational feasibility of the negotiation process, which means striking a politically acceptable balance between winners and losers throughout the enlarged Union.
There are certainly winners and losers.
The Internet is not a game of winners or losers; everyone can win.
To be sure, while there may have been much “cheap talk” – general advice with disclaimers – most of the losers in this game are not starving.
For instance, it would have been possible to provide income support to job losers – which would have been useful after the crisis as well – by reforming the system of unemployment benefits.
That way, we can dump the losers and keep the winners.
Darwin argued that more organisms are born than can survive and reproduce; that this leads to a struggle for existence; and that success in this struggle partly reflects the physical and behavioral differences between the winners and the losers.
After all, the global economy is too complex to be viewed as a zero-sum game with clear winners and losers.
Even if losers were fully compensated, the sum of the gains – shared by the firm, its mostly part-time workers, and its customers – would far outweigh the losses.
For starters, there are the losers: traditional taxi drivers, who often have had to pay large license fees and thus cannot compete with Uber’s low prices.
Winners and Losers in the Post-9/11 EraSeptember 11, 2001, is one of those dates that mark a transformation in world politics.
But the scandal has begotten many losers.
Otherwise, both sides will find themselves among the losers.
Some regions - especially in the tropics - might be big losers in this process, even though they themselves have done little to cause the problems.
This belief is based on a principle called “Pareto optimality,” which assumes that the people who gain higher incomes can always compensate the losers.
The dominant ideology of government non-intervention naturally intensifies resistance to change among the losers from globalization and technology, and creates overwhelming problems in sequencing economic reforms.
BackNext