Example collocations logo

Losers in sentence

496 examples of Losers in a sentence

The fact that globalization produces both winners and losers certainly explains much of the anti-globalization backlash now apparent in the UK and elsewhere.
In short, the AI-driven revolution will have its winners and losers.
The reason is that the losers in this system tend to be poor, politically unorganized, and inarticulate, while their more fortunate fellow citizens are insured for the costs of treatment and reap the benefits of the high-tech excellence for which American medicine is renowned.
A China-led transaction-based world order would have clear winners and losers – and the latter would far outnumber the former.
The answer is that fiscal policy is the key tool politicians use to attract and maintain the support of a winning coalition of voters, say retirees, public employees, and middle-class homeowners, while imposing the costs on the losers.
However, monetary policy is a much more awkward, indirect and imprecise way of choosing winners and losers than fiscal policy.
If that game prevails, the non-US G7 will end up being the losers.
In the “Brexit” vote, the fault lines were clear: rich versus poor, gainers versus losers from trade/globalization, skilled versus unskilled, educated versus less educated, young versus old, urban versus rural, and diverse versus more homogenous communities.
But they also included workers – both blue- and white-collar – who were among the losers from globalization, but who nonetheless remained loyal, either because they were socially and religiously conservative, or because center-left parties were formally supporters of unions, workers’ rights, and entitlement programs.
After the 2008 financial crisis, globalization’s losers started to organize and find anti-establishment champions on both the left and the right.
On the left, the losers in the UK and the US, especially young people, found champions in traditional center-left parties: Jeremy Corbyn in the UK’s Labour Party, and Bernie Sanders in America’s Democratic Party.
A similar revolt took place in the UK’s Conservative Party, with globalization’s losers coalescing around the party’s “Leave” campaign or shifting allegiance to the populist anti-EU UK Independence Party.
But, despite the growing number, organization, and mobilization of globalization’s losers, globalization itself is not necessarily doomed.
For starters, it continues to yield net benefits for advanced and emerging markets alike, which is why the losers still tend to be a minority in most advanced economies, while those who benefit from globalization are a large – if at times silent – majority.
Finally, economic theory suggests that globalization can be made to benefit all as long as the winners compensate the losers.
Only by enacting such policies will globalization’s losers begin to think that they may eventually join the ranks of its winners.
In the Scramble scenario, nations rush to secure energy resources for themselves, fearing that energy security is a zero-sum game, with clear winners and losers.
Cuba could use the IMF’s financial assistance and technical advice as it compensates short-term losers, retrains the unemployed, and supports new businesses.
Of course, a new competitive landscape will create winners and losers.
Not surprisingly, the loudest voices are heard from companies that face challenges and are among the potential losers.
In short, there are clear winners and losers in Catalonia’s push for independence.
Supervised by a blue-ribbon commission of college presidents and distinguished jurists, they have all been honest, fair, and peaceful, with the results accepted by winners and losers.
As the Khashoggi spectacle has unfolded, the two biggest political losers have been MBS and Trump.
The French model, which focuses on redressing excessive social inequalities through transfers, was built at a time when the number of losers was relatively small.
But, as the share of losers has grown alongside the emergence of a postindustrial economy, this model has reached its limits, with the growing amount of redistribution undermining economic efficiency.
People began to note a distinct and deepening disparity between globalization’s winners and losers, with weak wage growth accompanied by robust returns for the wealthy.
To be sure, the dramatic drop in the price of oil will produce winners and losers.
In other words, there are no losers in the fight to mitigate climate change and its consequences.
Governments have a very important educational, admonitory, and regulatory role to play: people should know the risks and probabilities, for they may wind up among losers of the other $630 billion.
When members of society who believed they were on the winning side of history come to fear that they are among the losers, the result is a radical shift in politics.
BackNext