Example collocations logo

Losers in sentence

496 examples of Losers in a sentence

This second type is inherently unstable, because the losers tend to opt out.
Meanwhile, Italy, now under the watchful eye of the International Monetary Fund, needs to move ahead with those pro-growth reforms in order to reassure the ECB’s shareholders that the central bank’s bond purchases are not money losers.
From being the region’s losers of the last few decades, the Shia now have the chance to redress the balance, settle old scores - and control the wealth of Petrolistan.
As in so many other ways, things have turned out differently: the oil companies are the big winners, while the American and global economies are losers.
This requirement means that average corporate-tax revenue must remain the same, which implies that there will be winners and losers: some will pay less than they do now, and others will pay more.
One might get away with this in the case of personal income tax, because even if the losers notice, they are not sufficiently organized.
Other corporate tax reforms might make sense; but they, too, imply winners and losers.
And so long as the losers are numerous and organized enough, they are likely to have the power to stop the reform.
More likely is a token across-the-board tax cut: the losers will be future generations, out-lobbied by today’s avaricious moguls, the greediest of whom include those who owe their fortunes to scummy activities, like gambling.
It is often said that surplus countries will always be the biggest losers in any tit-for-tat escalation of tariffs and other barriers.
In the US, a nation that prides itself on its democratic traditions, pigs and calves are hardly the only losers.
The unspoken premise is that there must be no losers, not even in the short term.
Many gain—and are well placed to compensate the losers.
double down on having government pick winners and losers in green energy; expand spending on education and infrastructure; and substantially reduce defense expenditures.
If these are the winners, who are the losers?
There is only one answer: the losers, in this crisis, can only be the member states; either directly; or indirectly, through the weakening of the independence of “their” national Commissioners.
In a global race, there are winners and losers.
In a “Digital China,” there will necessarily be winners and losers.
The losers in the Civil War were never quite reconciled to their defeat.
He regards international relations as a zero-sum game of winners and losers, and, to the extent that his foreign and trade policies make any sense at all, they are transactional.
Europe needs to make the likes of Microsoft and Intel feel at home in Brussels, Paris, or Berlin, not to become a political market leader in supplying sympathetic verdicts to market losers.
There will be – must be – many losers.
This is no coincidence: if allocated competitively, such a supra-national budget would identify winners and losers.
Gone are the confident assertions that globalization benefits everyone: we must, the elites now concede, accept that globalization produces both winners and losers.
But the correct response is not to halt or reverse globalization; it is to ensure that the losers are compensated.
“Only by enacting such policies will globalization’s losers begin to think that they may eventually join the ranks of its winners.”
Therefore, trade deals unambiguously enhance national wellbeing only to the extent that winners compensate losers.
Research in Europe has shown that losers from globalization within countries tend to favor more active social programs and labor-market interventions.
As Larry Mishel, president of the Economic Policy Institute, puts it, “ignoring the losers was deliberate.”
Today’s consensus concerning the need to compensate globalization’s losers presumes that the winners are motivated by enlightened self-interest – that they believe buy-in from the losers is essential to maintain economic openness.
BackNext