Eugenics
in sentence
34 examples of Eugenics in a sentence
And some think there's like a social Darwinism at work in our world, and maybe even a
eugenics
as well.
And in fact, we can just go back one century to the last century to see the power that
eugenics
can have.
There was a
eugenics
rising, and my grandparents realized, pretty quickly I think, that they were on the wrong side of the
eugenics
equation.
And so despite this being their home and their whole extended family's home, and this area being their family's home for generations, they decided because of
eugenics
that they had to leave.
So today, I see a new
eugenics
kind of bubbling to the surface.
It's supposed to be a kinder, gentler, positive eugenics, different than all that past stuff.
But I think even though it's focused on trying to improve people, it could have negative consequences, and it really worries me that some of the top proponents of this new eugenics, they think CRISPR is the ticket to make it happen.
So I have to admit, you know, eugenics, we talk about making better people.
I talked about eugenics, but there would be risks to individuals as well.
At that time, many people believed in eugenics, the idea that desirable and undesirable genetic traits could and should be controlled in humans through selective breeding.
Under the influence of eugenics, scientists used the results of the military initiative to make erroneous claims that certain racial groups were intellectually superior to others.
The intersection of
eugenics
and IQ testing influenced not only science, but policy as well.
Are we headed for a new
eugenics?
Oh man, it is amazing how somebody can claim global warming to be a science, well, I guess this elitist nonsense is now replacing the science of
eugenics!
The humans are slaves and are used for
eugenics
and organ donation.
This film is her indictment of abortion, but she cleverly muddles the issue by bringing in
eugenics
and birth control, leaving the impression that they are somehow equivalent to abortion.
This is the future you buy into, folks - a battle between (vaguely African descent) aliens and (mostly white) humans, for an earth that is little more than a wasteland, following a global disaster caused by poor
eugenics.
So it is, in a way, and in the hands of authoritarian regimes, genetic selection could resemble the evils of earlier forms of eugenics, with their advocacy of odious, pseudoscientific official policies, particularly concerning “racial hygiene.”
In liberal, market driven societies, however,
eugenics
will not be coercively imposed by the state for the collective good.
Or are reprogenetics and
eugenics
fundamentally different from one another in terms of both control and purpose?
Wilson, Hitler, and Obama are linked by a chain of highly permissive association altogether typical of conspiracy theorizing in general, and of its anti-Semitic variety in particular: Wilson was a “progressive”; some progressives dabbled in
eugenics
(never mind that some conservatives did as well); the
eugenics
movement influenced Hitler;Obama, too, is a progressive.
Claims of this type have a long, discredited history, stretching back through the
eugenics
movement of the early 20th century to its acknowledged ‘father,’ Francis Galton, in Victorian England.
But whatever the
eugenics
movement’s extravagant claims and social crimes, including the forced sterilization of thousands (mainly women) in Europe and the US, today it is supposed to be different.
Yet uncritical attempts to apply biological science to legislation about the human condition, if we are not careful, may lead us back into the dark days of
eugenics.
These critics, especially in Germany, where stem cell research evokes nightmares of Nazi era eugenics, argue that research with stem cells derived from embryos is unnecessary because multi-potential stem cells occur naturally in adult tissues as well.
This opens the way to full-blown
eugenics
– the selection (by parents, authorities, or others) of children with characteristics considered “appropriate.”
The critics’ last argument – that opening the door to repairing genetic disorders will also leave the way open for
eugenics
– is the most worrying.
Those seeking to limit genetic engineering to such efforts would be better off devoting their energies to explaining why
eugenics
is wrong, rather than attempting to stop the march of progress toward healing the sick and eliminating awful disorders.
PALO ALTO – Race can undoubtedly be a tricky subject, with any suggestion of genetic differences among racial groups – beyond superficial characteristics like skin color – potentially invoking memories of the nineteenth-century
eugenics
movement and its eventual role in Nazi ideology.
Yet, in view of past efforts by officials to employ genetics to improve public health – most notably, the early-twentieth-century
eugenics
movement, with its appalling forced sterilization campaigns – it is important to ensure that such power is wielded judiciously and on the basis of sound science.
Related words
Movement
Genetic
Science
Would
Think
There
Their
Social
People
Humans
Different
Could
Claims
Century
About
Wrong
Through
Supposed
Superior
Sterilization