Example collocations logo

Employers in sentence

572 examples of Employers in a sentence

Though self-employment and part-time labor are hardly new, the sharing economy is different, because it allows freelancers to become “nano-workers,” shifting among employers not just monthly or even weekly, but several times a day.
Meanwhile, increasingly intense competition in the production phase drives down prices, so that the actual producers, whether employers or workers, receive diminishing shares of the value pie.
This prevents potentially positive matching of the skills needed by employers and the available supply of them.
Countries like Germany that reformed labor laws to create more flexibility for employers, and did not raise wages rapidly, seem to be in better economic shape than countries like France and Spain, where labor was better protected.
We expect these programs – accessible to young people in Arab countries and beyond – will attract significant interest from students and strong support from employers.
In many economies, too many unemployed graduates coexist with a large number of employers who cannot find workers with the skills they need.
Employers will have to invest in their workforces.
Social unrest, on the other hand, has already erupted, with violent protests by students and radical trade-union factions fueling alarm – as have threats and aggression against officials of both trade unions and employers’ associations.
Indeed, to insist on greater labor-market flexibility, without ensuring that workers, who face a constant need to adapt to technological disruptions, can rely on continuous social-safety nets, is to advocate a lopsided world in which employers have all the flexibility and employees have very little.
Making modern labor markets flexible for employers and employees alike would require a UBI’s essential features, like portability and free choice.
Foreign employers are appalled by the poor quality of Thailand’s education system, whose graduates have little foreign language proficiency and possess scant analytical skills.
For me, a compelling hypothesis is that workers, shaken by the 2008 financial crisis and the deep recession that resulted, have grown afraid to demand promotions or to search for better-paying employers – despite the ease of finding work in the recently tight labor market.
A corollary hypothesis is that employers, disturbed by the extremely slow growth of productivity, especially in the past ten years, have grown leery of granting pay raises – despite the return of demand to pre-crisis proportions.
Similarly, private-sector skills-matching initiatives, such as LinkedIn for Good’s “Welcome Talent” program in Sweden and Talent Beyond Boundaries in Jordan and Lebanon, allow employers to tap into migrant talent pools that fit their hiring needs.
The weak economy has caused people to postpone consumption of health-care services and has encouraged states and employers to restrain their spending on health.
If the eligibility age were to increase, responsibility for health care for many people would simply be dumped back onto their employers, resulting in higher health-care costs for all working people.
Such protests against public agencies, employers, and developers are now commonplace (though not always authorized).
And new digital platforms are already connecting job seekers and employers, providing vocational training, and hosting start-up incubators.
Because the future economy will need technologically capable workers, curricula should be reoriented toward STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) subjects and away from the social studies that were long prized by public-sector employers.
This makes most employers a little nervous.
Inasmuch as corporate leaders work for the owners of the business, their responsibility is to pursue the best interests of their employers - interests that relate primarily to making as much money as possible while conforming to the legal rules and ethical norms of society.
In the United States, pharmacy benefit managers (PBM) handle prescriptions for almost all large employers and account for more than 200 million individuals.
More flexible pension arrangements, legal reforms, and media and education campaigns aimed at shifting employers’ perceptions of older workers will allow individuals to keep working for longer.
If most community members work for just a few employers and obtain health care from just a few providers, the effort of corralling the players will be easier.
That money ultimately comes from individuals and employers who pay it in taxes, insurance premiums, or direct payments, and should be intercepted somewhere between the payers and the health-care delivery system.
There also are large employers that might decide to work with other employers in certain communities.
The money may be paid by employers, private insurers, or government health-care funds (the trickiest source).
This makes it extremely difficult to let workers go, which makes employers reluctant to hire new people in the first place.
A university-educated Syrian civil engineer arriving in Munich will need to learn some German; but, once this is done, he or she is unlikely to have to wait too long before employers come knocking.
Public funding also benefits a country’s economy, because large employers are spared the expense of providing health benefits to their workers.
BackNext