Design
in sentence
3133 examples of Design in a sentence
But a real challenge is to find, to
design
to create, to empower those connectors that are able to innovate, to transform noise and silence into signal and finally bring our democracies to the 21st century.
This realization was exploited most powerfully for pragmatic ends by the 18th- century philosopher Jeremy Bentham, who set out to resolve an important problem ushered in by the industrial age, where, for the first time, institutions had become so large and centralized that they were no longer able to monitor and therefore control each one of their individual members, and the solution that he devised was an architectural
design
originally intended to be implemented in prisons that he called the panopticon, the primary attribute of which was the construction of an enormous tower in the center of the institution where whoever controlled the institution could at any moment watch any of the inmates, although they couldn't watch all of them at all times.
And crucial to this
design
was that the inmates could not actually see into the panopticon, into the tower, and so they never knew if they were being watched or even when.
Moderator: So his revelations, your analysis, the work of other journalists, have really developed the debate, and many governments, for example, have reacted, including in Brazil, with projects and programs to reshape a little bit the
design
of the Internet, etc.
Since we believe early cancer detection should really be democratized, this entire solution costs at least 50 times less than current available methods, and we know that the community can help us accelerate this even more, so we're making the
design
of the device open-source.
So while we're making sweeping progress in human health, in technology, in education and design, we are doing dangerously little to help the victims and we are doing far too little to stop and prevent the wars that are driving them from their homes.
I'm not saying every single community in the east is on the margin, or every community on the margin is in the east, but I'm trying to make a bigger point about disparity by
design.
But the human
design
decisions that we make to separate ourselves is not natural.
We clearly weren't even trying to
design
for the benefit of everyone, so we ended up dealing with issues like redlining.
We've made similarly sinister
design
decisions on any number of issues, from water infrastructure to where we decide to place grocery stores versus liquor stores, or even for whom and how we
design
and fund technology products.
We got ourselves into this eastside dilemma through bad design, and so we can get out of it with good
design.
And I believe the first principle of good
design
is actually really simple: we have to start with the commitment to
design
for the benefit of everyone.
But at the core, it's this fundamental
design
principle, this choice of whether we're going to decide to take care of everyone.
And all I'm saying is, we should
design
our economy and our communities with that in mind.
If you look at their patent carefully, especially if you have any engineering background or talent, you may decide that you see one or two points where the
design
is not perfectly adequate.
The
design
is different every year.
They're resilient; their redundancy is built into this fabulous decentralized
design.
If there's any power in design, that's the power of synthesis.
So allow me to share three cases where we tried to apply
design'
s power of synthesis.
Due to the difficulty of the question, we decided to include the families in the process of understanding the constraints, and we started a participatory
design
process, and testing what was available there in the market.
We identified five
design
conditions that belonged to the hard half of a house, and we went back to the families to do two things: join forces and split tasks.
Our
design
was something in between a building and a house.
So the purpose of design, trying to understand and trying to give an answer to the "3S" menace, scale, speed, and scarcity, is to channel people's own building capacity.
So, with the right design, slums and favelas may not be the problem but actually the only possible solution.
The second case is how
design
can contribute to sustainability.
So with the right design, sustainability is nothing but the rigorous use of common sense.
Last case I would like to share is how
design
can provide more comprehensive answers against natural disasters.
We were given 100 days, three months, to
design
almost everything, from public buildings to public space, street grid, transportation, housing, and mainly how to protect the city against future tsunamis.
This was new in Chilean urban design, and there were in the air a couple of alternatives.
As in the housing process, we had to include the community in the way of finding a solution for this, and we started a participatory
design
process.
Back
Next
Related words
About
Which
Their
Would
There
Could
People
Really
Think
World
Production
Where
Other
Should
Things
Going
First
Actually
Technology
Process
