Critics
in sentence
1600 examples of Critics in a sentence
According to Royal’s Socialist critics, the “Hollywoodization” of politics from which she benefits entails a new approach in which leaders follow and followers lead.
Such an agreement would be difficult for
critics
to decry, and could help to overcome conservative opposition in the United States.
Some
critics
have been upset by my argument that the neurotransmitter dopamine, which is related to motivation, focus, and reward, is part of what can make sexual pleasure empowering for women.
US President Barack Obama has allowed yet another “red line” to be crossed,
critics
say.
Critics
might counter that no one should care how much profit a company earns, so long as it provides a worthwhile service.
Critics
like the German economist Hans-Werner Sinn have made a specialty of tracking exposure to the break-up risk.
The Alberta government – and the oil companies that influence it – would upgrade “tar sands” to “oil sands,” apparently thinking that a better name somehow silences environmental
critics.
Critics
warned that the war would cause instability in Iraq and the Middle East, and that this would lead to high oil prices.
But the
critics
were right.
Iran pursued mass prosecutions of government
critics
following President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s controversial reelection in 2009, and it now appears that some of Ahmadinejad’s allies may themselves become collateral damage in his conflict with Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Hosseini Khamenei, facing politically motivated criminal trials.
Yet efforts to communicate this to the public have been met with skepticism from some critics, who argue that the vaccine gives young girls tacit consent to engage in sexual activity, ultimately leading to an increase in promiscuity.
In fact,
critics
have been quick to highlight the populist undertones of Renzi’s proclamations, with one, La Repubblica founder Eugenio Scalfari, arguing that the prime minister is merely implementing an agenda that was crafted by his predecessors and commanded by the EU.
Thus, European
critics
of the fine imposed on BNP Paribas are right to emphasize its disproportionate nature.
Critics
point out that “plain old bad lending” by the commercial banks accounted for 90% of banks’ losses.
Some
critics
of globalization might welcome such an outcome.
Critics
have argued that the agreement does not go far enough in terms of reflecting the new realities of the global economy.
And even though
critics
often caricature the EU’s internal negotiating process as overly lengthy and tedious, it has undoubtedly produced positive results.
Critics
charge that the agreement undermines the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) by letting India have its cake (nuclear weapons) and eat it, too (by giving it access to nuclear fuel and technology).
To be fair, the
critics
are right, at least in part.
Where the
critics
of the proposed US-India accord are wrong is in charging that such a double standard is wrong when it comes to India because it opens the way for countries such as North Korea and Iran to develop nuclear weapons.
Critics
seize upon these embellishments to argue that there is really not much of a problem.
Domestically, too, the nine-dotted line may cause problems for the government by presenting
critics
with a useful weapon.
May then announced that she was going to talk to other EU presidents and prime ministers to get the sort of reassurances that might satisfy her right-wing
critics.
Those
critics
have operated increasingly like a party within a party.
Critics
say she is trying to push any vote as close to the exit date as possible, in order to pressure MPs to support her plan.
Whatever
critics
at home and abroad may think, the “surge” that President Bush is planning for Iraq is more than a troop increase; it is a new and high-risk regional strategy.
Indeed,
critics
of the government believe that its incendiary rhetoric might lead to a devastating war.
If he does that, he could turn his presidency around, confound his critics, and leave a positive legacy.
Critics
accuse business of “co-legislating” with the regime.
What
critics
of China’s land reclamation need to understand is that, even without any credible sovereignty claims to the sea area in question, or any islands within it, under international law China does have the right to build artificial islands and installations, including airstrips, on outlying reefs and shoals.
Back
Next
Related words
Movie
Their
About
Would
Which
There
Argue
Should
Other
Point
Think
People
Economic
Government
Could
Being
Political
After
Really
Against