Example collocations logo

Considering in sentence

1556 examples of Considering in a sentence

Deep Shock was really crap, a big shame considering the fact that it looks pretty high budget.
Todd Sheets is still the director, but no longer the screenwriter, which isn't a negative or a positive, considering he's just as untalented as the guy who wrote this one.
The acting was average, considering they were all unheard of actors, but the story was pathetic, the dialog was pathetic.
Considering this movie was made for TV is was interesting enough to watch the sequel.
I was very disappointed considering the tools that Tim Burton has at his disposal.
Considering the limits of this film (The entire movie in one setting - a music studio - only about 5 or 6 actors total) it should have been much better made.
A one is the highest rating I could have given this movie, considering zero and negative numbers are not allowed.
Considering the material---army life is always good for a laugh---and the stars, this movie should have been a fall down laughfest.
The villain is also very bad as he is slow moving and really you wonder how he manages to do anything considering he is afraid of jewelery.
Considering the script I have to imagine that there was not enough money in the budget for things like continuity and original ideas.
The acting was nothing above average, and considering the fact that there wasn't much to act out, this was severely disappointing.
Considering that for so many years TV would not even play the farting noises when they televised the movie, it is inconceivable that they thought they could put a show on TV with the "N" word thrown around.
Nothing in the way the film is directed, written or acted shows any sign of humor or sarcasm, which is quite amazing considering the film is about an invisible-never-heard-of-before-flesh-eating-virus (no laughs please).
If I wasn't considering it to be a total failure, I would agree to reckon that the film has one talent: it is filthy disgusting to watch.
Enjoyed the acting of Tom Hanks, (Robbie Wheeling), who was very young looking and gave an outstanding performance considering it was a horrible script.
I thought the first season was a decent effort considering the expectations of following such a success that is Grey's Anatomy.
GET THAT THOUGHT OUT OF YOUR HEAD RIGHT NOW!!! I'm trying to save you the trouble of watching this movie by telling you that it is so bad that there is no point in even considering seeing it.
Considering how much money was budgeted for this film, you would expect more from the story as a whole.
It didn't make any difference considering that even if she had been walking on the ceiling it would not have changed the pattern of the film.
It's also very poorly made, surprisingly so considering it came from MGM. Leonard Smith's bare bones cinematography is strictly from the 'set up the camera and don't move it' school, frequently to the detriment of the cast, who find themselves delivering lines off screen (it's like a pan and scan print before such existed!) or having their heads cut off.
Considering that this movie had a serious and quite successful launching campaign, I would have expected something to be worth the fuzz...from the opening scene on (in which the two brothers "sensually" caress each other, laying naked in a bed) it goes rapidly downwards...nothing to get the attention, not a mind-catching thing in the whole plot, baaad baad acting (a few minor exceptions, but artificiality is at its best).
I think that she did a good job, considering all the pressure that she was under.
Too many warrior-wizard movies out there have used the same old plotline numerous times over, but this is mighty scarce considering its appeal to the little darlings.
I just watched this movie last night, and I HAD to put a warning out for anybody else considering to see this film.
The other characters were not very developed which is a crime, considering how Austen could paint such wonderful characters with some carefully chosen understatements.
One thing that astonished me about this film (and not in a good way) was that Nathan Stoltzfus, who seems to pride himself on being the major historian on the topic of the Rosenstrasse, was one of the historians working on this film, considering how much of the actual events were altered or disregarded.
Haven't seen that one yet, but, considering it is one of the most highly acclaimed horror movies ever, safe to say I made the wrong choice.
Technically the film is OK considering it was made 70 years ago, the black & white cinematography is adequate although some of the scenes look like they were shot against a photo of the background location.
Considering this plot, it sure is hard to imagine making it boring, but the people who made this cheap exploitational film have!
That's very bad considering that I was only 7 and I remember that.
BackNext