Characters
in sentence
10488 examples of Characters in a sentence
Unforgiven, though simple in plot it falls flat on
characters
and emotions and i would certainly say that Unforgiven is Eastwoods worst film to date.
On an other note these are the least likable
characters
I have ever seen, and I have seen movies with Hitler in them.
The
characters
were one-dimensional.
Unlike Chuck Jones's Road Runner series, which strived to introduce new jokes to the same setting, Freleng's series seemed happy enough to recycle jokes as long as the
characters
were in a different place.
There was just nothing to watch, and although its a sad tale, supposedly, its just so stupid that its hard to feel any sympathy for the
characters.
The fact that it was based on a Harlan Cohen book is telling, because rather than being a French film (strong on psychology and character), it's more like a John Grisham-esquire roller-coaster ride by numbers with ludicrous plot twists, flashbacks that update previous flashbacks, a predictable villain (as soon as his name is mentioned you think 'hmm, he'll be the bad guy!') and sets of mysterious stereotyped
characters
who seem to inhabit different movies.
By the end I was laughing hysterically at the unevenness of the film's tone (the scenes where the lead character is being helped by two streetwise shady
characters
are unintentionally hilarious), the utterly baffling plot, the absurd coincidences and strokes of good fortune (e.g.
probably the worst creature feature ever,boa vs python was a million times better then this & that wasn't great either,bad acting,bad effects & guess what the DVD is one of those one with 3 hours of previews before the main menu.probably the least scary movie ever,no blood or violence,people are stupid and keep using pistols when they have no affect on these animals, the only cool part was the radioactive leeches that was pretty cool,i name of the island is just a rip off of Jurassic park boring tiring & not worth even looking at but i suppose the
characters
stupidity is pretty funny so it would make a good comedy film but definitely not a thriller
It's filled with glaring plot holes,
characters
who are ruled by stupidity, bad acting and above all, a poor script which has been done before in many, many films, only better.
There's a supremely bizarre bit of animation where one of the
characters
gets his elaborately waxed moustache tweaked and stretched, complete with a boingy sound effect that causes him to go boss-eyed.
The
characters
are one-dimensional -- either good, freedom-loving Americans, or brainless, greedy, evil conservatives.
Also, there's no indication in the film as it stands as to why the source novel was called "Deadlier than the Male" -- but perhaps James Gunn made the female
characters
stronger and more interesting than they are in the film.
The plot of "Open Graves" is very simple:it's about a board game called Mamba,where the players die in real life the same way they die in the game.Laughable death scenes include killings via computer generated crabs and snakes.The
characters
are cardboard and deliberately annoying and there isn't even a tiny bit of suspense.I liked Eliza Dushku in "Wrong Turn",but she is completely wasted and unmemorable here.The climax with CGI-witch coming from the sea is utterly laughable and stupid.The only reason to see "Open Graves" are some interesting camera angles plus sexy Eliza Dushku.If such movies are the future of horror then I seriously give up.Give me any 70's or 80's low-budget horror flick over this modern piece of crap.A generous 3 out of 10.
I felt the wide array of
characters
Varney depicted were great, but without being said, the rest of the movie should be put into a mulcher or something.
These
characters
were capable of holding their own in their own movies, and the choice of actors was deplorable.
I enjoy gay-themed movies where the
characters
aren't stereotypically gay and that's what attracted me to this movie, that and the principal actor, which is the only reason I'm giving this movie one more star than it deserves (although not because of his acting in the film, let me tell you).
The principal idea behind the film is rather an original one, considering the abundance of killer-doll-based scare-fests which have been foist upon us over the years; unfortunately, the story is handled with all the subtlety of the latest Michael Bay actioner, with a cast of
characters
which are uniformly unlikable and played with precision-perfect dreadfulness by actors presumably sifted from daytime Korean soap operas.
I'm not boasting in any way, but from the start, I realised they were in some sort of toybox/can, with the huge eye looking down on them, to the type of
characters
in there.
Even though throughout the episode, the questions of "Who are we?", "Where are we?", "What's outside?" carry the suspense of the episode (which I unfortunately already figured out), I must say that different types of
characters
and the interaction between them did make the episode interesting enough.
I watched all the movies and appreciated each one for what they retained from the old series and for further developing the
characters
(and the Star Trek universe, in general).
Even in "The Undiscovered Country" I thought the aging of the
characters
was well handled and the story worthy of a theatrical release.
The scene where Sybok conjures up images of Spock's pain and McCoy's pain shatters the image of the
characters
as we've known them.
The whole scene is wasted and really shows us nothing new and nothing we want to see from these
characters.
It's a shame that most of the other
characters
have so few lines and so little to do with most of this movie.
The acting was dull, the humor was tedious and the characters/plot felt like they spent about 10 minutes creating their entire personalities which gave the uninspiring actors/actresses no range on how to portray their
characters
with the least bit of depth.
This doesn't hold a candle to contemporary zombie flicks like Shaun of the dead,day of the dead, land of the dead etc. Horror flicks sometimes take a while to get going, you have to build up the
characters
so when they snuff it,you feel some empathy etc but even so, there's a full 45 minutes to sit through here even before you sniff a corpse, up to that point,its like watching a bad soap opera, nothing of any interest or relevance happens and if you are going to watch this for the first time,you can honestly start watching after 45 minutes, you won't miss anything plot- wise.
These
characters
on the screen speak Greek, they listen to Greek music but who are they?
The reason I even selected this movie was that the plot idea appealed to me-- this era in history, the type of
characters
that are poor and uneducated, the setting --and the love triangle.
The
characters
are soulless and stupid.
The
characters
in this film were just so over the top and unbelievable.
Back
Next
Related words
Movie
Their
Story
There
About
Other
Really
Which
Great
Could
Acting
Would
Interesting
Actors
People
Between
Character
Where
First
Scenes
