Example collocations logo

Characters in sentence

10488 examples of Characters in a sentence

I am a harsh grader, so the 3 rating reflects mostly on the characters and plot.
DeVito characters work best when depraved.
The characters are one dimensional, which is okay in comedy.
Were cretinous characters not enough to contend with in this nihilistic nonsense, we're treated to yet another film where American tourists find themselves in jeopardy simply because they are Americans.
Underdeveloped and stereotyped characters, way over-the-top overacting, cheesy special effects, talking robots, no less than 20 double-foot jumpkicks, impossible situations, unfunny "gags" and "jokes", elementary school premise, mindless killings, and too-long running time for the material.
No idea how any issue brought is solved, no hot babes, no swearing to lighten the bad plot, characters, acting... I'm now tired of this tirade.
A few examples: in an early scene Soviet infantry are attacked by the Germans; instead of staying in their trenches to shoot at them, they advance into open ground to fight them,contrary to all infantry tactics; Kate, one of the central characters, is supposedly the daughter of a White Russian and obsessed with her Russianness, yet she does not speak Russian; a guilt-stricken German airman attacks an anti-aircraft gun- the gun, however, does not fire shrapnel shells but scores a direct hit on his 'plane, which doesn't look much like a German 'plane of WWII.
Updating the storyline to the present time just didn't work and the altering of characters an absolute travesty- why did they introduce Bette Midler's character when she disappeared just as quickly as she arrived; the related character in the 1939 original was an integral part of the plot.
It had a dim-witted story line, plus some moronic and sadistic Native American characters that are thurroughly offensive by today's standards.
The characters developed well enough - an all-star cast made it oh-so promising, just a shame the plot was patently absurd.
Starting off by the characters physical appearances...like Channing Tantums lack of tattoos n Amanda Seyfried not being a brunette lol but i let that go...the character developments were not there at all...you didn't have time to love amanda seyfried character and you couldn't feel for her or for john when they first separated...i thought the two weeks were rushed and i hated that she left first then him...it took the emotional separation away...and why did they change Tim from the book...why did they make him a dad instead of a brother and why did they make him sooo old looking and the movie lacked that intense moment when they find out what happens at the end (didnt want to spoil it lol but for those who watched it u know what i mean) and whhhyyyy ooooo wwhyyyy did they change the ending...in the book it was heartbreaking and emotional and it emphasized on Channing Tatums character's decision whhyyy did they twist it...it just made it look like a rushed ending...it was terrible...thats what disappointed me the most...the ending of the book should have been exactly the same :(
The predictability hardly ended with those characters.
Tired voices, tired actors and bored characters and situations.
Like all soaps, it consists entirely of totally unlikeable characters being unpleasant to each other, but it's ten times as bad as the next worst one could be.
So why does he just pretend to be dead between the two main characters?
The characters in these movies were based upon the crimes of Ed Gein.
You never get to know the characters and it's hard to care what happens to them.
All the characters are decent i guess, but the story is so so, however Jackie Chan is still amazing in this even if he did look bored.
The opening is supposed to be memorable, but it's nothing i haven't seen before and done better at that, and i thought the whole film was rather lazy and could have been an awesome film if Jackie had control of it!, plus i really didn't root for any of the characters.
The only characters I seemed to like were Dustin, Quinn, Stacey, Michael & Logan.
However, I will give the previously listed characters credit because they did make the show more or less worth my time.
It teaches kids nothing, the songs are corny, it is not educational and the characters are just plain agitating.
In my opinion, Chaplin's voice simply did not fit his silent characters that made him rich and famous.
In the first and second seasons, we had different story lines, we saw the characters history, a little action, a little romance, now is like one big event that takes the whole episode to unveil.
The WWE is so bad that it ceases to even be a former shell of itself by pushing characters and wrestlers into the main event suddenly and by retaining barriers of creativity.
The surroundings are screwball-sophisticated yet the characters are not more than one-dimensional.
It also show a whole bunch of incompletely drawn characters doing inexplicable things.
All the characters are OK, and the story while had a lot of potential is rather dull, however the blood transfusion scenes looked frighteningly real, and as a result they were extremely disturbing.
Has some interesting peripheral characters.
The fact that the characters were depicted as being Medical Students made me wonder if they had gone to a foreign Correspondence School to get their degrees.
BackNext