Example collocations logo

Audience in sentence

3750 examples of Audience in a sentence

It's too bad because this film had great production values and a good cast, but isn't the idea of turning a book into a movie (TV or film) to get the people who read the book to be part of the audience.
None of the actors actually connect with each other and as a result the movie does not connect with the audience.
Every second of it was just maddening, excruciating pain for the audience, because the whole movie all-around was horrible!
If you plan on viewing this and have a moral problem with the degradation of the marital act for the viewing pleasure of an audience then you are making a big mistake.
As for John's acting, he doesn't look particularly comfortable, despite apparent efforts to make him look at home; he seems to be ducking the camera most of the time, and he never connects with the audience in an immediate way.
There may have been some good dancing available to the live audience but the video viewers will never know.
Must we be inundated with it as an audience?
I'm hoping that the frenetic pacing of the show is adjusted as the series develops along with the obvious cliches and dialogue so absurd I wondered just how stupid the writers imagined the core audience to be.
On another hand, Schroeder doesn't succeed in gaining the audience's emotion and adherence in front of the two main characters' distress.
The story is convoluted, it is not complex or clever and it does not have intelligent twists and turns, it is just a complete mess that spills out in multiple directions with the hope that the audience will think it is cool and intelligent (Hello magazine readers).
The scenes where Julia Roberts impersonates herself (with Bruce Willis undertaking a cameo role) whilst mildly amusing appear to be a desperate move to keep the audience interested.
I suppose it is possible there is a VERY select audience for a film like this, but I'm just not part of that audience, and not sure that I want to be.
Lost is the exciting and unpredictable storyline, and instead, in its place, is bland predictability with the obvious attempts at audience manipulation by a superficial pretentious production and distribution team.
This is what happens when distributors try to seek a wider audience (ridiculous sweeping shots of the Rio coastline, etc) at the expense of a gripping story and characters.
The level of detail it went into was minimal, and I always got the feeling the audience was being patronized -- there was a lot of what seemed to me as "This is extremely cool but we're not going to explain it in further detail because you won't get it anyway.
Apparently just to provide the audience with another Amos-n-Andy and the additionally overused cannibalistic portrayal of native Africans.
the film does not capture the beauty of europe.....and wasn't successful in leading the audience into suspense or wonder.
There is not much clarity to be found in helping the audience understand the motivations of any of these historical figures.
The film lurches backward and forward in fits and starts, its central figures adrift and seemingly out of place surrounded by the ersatz decadence of towering sets, the minutia of production detail and the, by 1984, cliche'd but gorgeous cinematographic confection on offer to the audience.
hey ....i really do not know why this film has been appreciated so much,perhaps i missed the point.The way i see it , a lot of international film makers have made brilliant films that have dealt with 'schizophrenia' and have informed ,excited ,shocked,evoked emotion and compelled the audience to step aside from their own reality and think.........while it is true that aparna sen's endeavor was an ambitious one ,in light of all the other movies , this one falls short..... miserably......it was too slow, there were no details about anything and the ending .... was completely ...pointless......it was not open ended or anything ....just pointless.....so watch it if you want to see a good concept completely wasted.......
But the director's weak swats at symbolism, philosophy and social commentary were completely off the mark, and it leaves us, the audience, feeling confused & disordered.
For the the uneducated American audience it might come across as a good film.
We were given a free showing in school and everyone in the audience just sat there embarrassed wondering when the fun would start.
an oirish film not made for an irish audience.
The film attempts to lead the audience down convoluted paths without any sense of symbolism or meaning, to make them sympathize with one-dimensional characters, and above all hopes that they will ignore the underdeveloped plot, full of unreconciled loose ends, by hiding it under a veneer of CGI effects and neo-surrealism.
How low can you as a broadcaster go to treat your audience like that?
When I saw it in a movie theater more than half the audience left before it was half over.
Humour is a very individual thing and the audience at the sneak preview of The Wog Boy seemed to enjoy it more than I did.
rarely does it actually elicit anything more than a chuckle and never provokes any sense of irony or thought from the audience.
every joke is interchangeable with "punchlines" that seem to be drawn out of a hat. the complete lack of originality combined with the even somehow lamer spin off it has spawned (see: American Dad) makes me question the intelliegence of an audience that continues to keep this horrid show on TV.
BackNext