Arguments
in sentence
981 examples of Arguments in a sentence
Pointless, juvenile, absolutely worthless(..unless you just have an urge to see stars from the original returning to reprise their roles)sequel to the original Sleepaway Camp(..the second and third films featuring Pamela Springsteen in the "prominant" role of Angela are completely disregarded, which is probably a good thing, I guess)has a psycho-killer, in black hoody, targeting those who victimize and mistreat extremely repellent frog-devoted Allan(Michael Gibney), always the center of negative attention in regards to practically everyone, in constant disagreements, arguments, and skirmishes with the teenagers/adults in camp.
As in the best times of the Cold War, and in the absence of more credible and convincing enemies have no reserves to use these despicable methods to manipulate the brains of people who have the misfortune to run into this crap that in the absence of
arguments
using weapons, explosions, shooting, violence absolutely free and what is worse, using the figure of a child and noble sentiments that are prostitutes to raise money.In possession of a genuine ingenuousness I wonder, how is it possible that there are people who can devote to a movie so bad?
The problem with these legalistic
arguments
is that NATO itself is flouting international law.
But the Declaration states, "We hold these truths to be self-evident," whereas the principles of the open society are anything but self-evident; they need to be established by convincing
arguments.
Yet there are compelling
arguments
to call a halt to the practice, inaugurated by Pinochet in 1978 and copied by military regimes in several other Latin American countries, to protect themselves by issuing amnesties for their own crimes.
But, of course, demand- and supply-side
arguments
are inextricably linked.
Of course, there will be
arguments
about the data, just as there are
arguments
about Wikipedia’s accuracy.
Not only are these
arguments
mutually contradictory; each also happens to be wrong.
There is some truth to these
arguments.
The
arguments
for low interest rates seem to me to require a degree of government competence that is unlikely, given political parties' current positions and the existing structure of the institutions that make fiscal policy.
The astonishing thing to me is how weak the right’s appraisal of Piketty’s
arguments
has turned out to be.
But the extraordinary thing about the conservative criticism of Piketty’s book is how little of it has developed any of these arguments, and how much of it has been devoted to a furious denunciation of its author’s analytical abilities, motivation, and even nationality.
We are impressed with the amount of work that he and his colleagues have put into collecting, assembling, and cleaning the data; the intelligence and skill with which he has constructed and presented his arguments; and how much blood Arthur Goldhammer sweated over the translation.
The purpose of betting, of course, is not to declare winners and losers; it is to replace endless, pointless
arguments
with a clear determination of whose understanding of reality is closer to the truth.
When it comes to learning about the world, betting on outcomes beats
arguments
that settle nothing.
It is difficult to believe that it would have had the same impact ten or even five years ago, in the immediate aftermath of the global financial crisis, even though identical
arguments
and evidence could have been marshaled then.
The reformers’
arguments
eventually gained ground: most of Vladimir Putin’s reforms during his first presidential term were promoted and even designed by the new capitalists.
But his
arguments
in this area failed his own “test of truth,” for they lacked “the power…to get…accepted in the competition of the market.”
The Volcker rule (named for former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker) provoked similar
arguments.
Without more sophisticated arguments, they might well find themselves submerged under a pile of regulatory sandbags.
Their shoddy
arguments
must be rebuked point by point, and their fugues of outrage must be met with calm, rational deliberation.
If we run away from populists, or try to copy their tactics and arguments, we will further undermine the social contract underpinning Western democracies.
But in representative democracies like the UK (and nearly all other democracies today), voters choose leaders to weigh up complex
arguments
and make tradeoffs.
Under these conditions, one of the populists’ strongest
arguments
is simply to point out that all the warnings by the globalist elite, Davos cosmopolitans, neoliberals, and one-percenters about the dangers of populist economics were baloney.
Maalouf hopes that one day he can call all of the Middle East his homeland, and that his grandson will find his book a strange memento of a time when these
arguments
had to be put forward.
The
arguments
for a rate hike are valid.
The Fed should regard lower commodity prices, reduced inflationary pressures, changes in the labor market, and further disruptive technological shifts as sufficiently convincing
arguments
to postpone a rate hike.
The Trouble with Libertarian PaternalismCHICAGO – There are many
arguments
against government paternalism: apart from limiting individual choice (for example, the choice to remain uninsured in the current health-care debate in the United States) and preventing individuals from learning, history suggests time and again that the conventional wisdom prevalent in society is wrong.
Typically, an interest group lobbies Congress, blandishing persuasive arguments, campaign contributions, and other support; often enough members – or enough key members – come to see the merit of the group’s point of view (or at least vote as if they do).
The
arguments
used to justify the coup are dubious.
Back
Next
Related words
Their
About
There
Which
Would
Against
Should
Economic
Other
Political
Could
Being
People
Policy
Often
Without
World
Think
Right
While