Arguments
in sentence
981 examples of Arguments in a sentence
We want strong arguments,
arguments
that have a lot of punch,
arguments
that are right on target.
We want killer
arguments.
It is the dominant way of thinking about
arguments.
When I'm talking about arguments, that's probably what you thought of, the adversarial model.
But the war metaphor, the war paradigm or model for thinking about arguments, has, I think, deforming effects on how we argue.
So, how can we find ways to make
arguments
yield something positive?
What we need is new exit strategies for
arguments.
But we're not going to have new exit strategies for
arguments
until we have new entry approaches to
arguments.
We need to think of new kinds of
arguments.
Here's my suggestion: If we want to think of new kinds of arguments, what we need to do is think of new kinds of arguers.
So try this: Think of all the roles that people play in
arguments.
There's the audience in rhetorical
arguments.
There's the reasoner in
arguments
as proofs.
Now, I lose a lot of
arguments.
When I came home in 1955 from university at the time of Martin Luther King, a lot of people came home at that time and started having
arguments
with their parents and grandparents.
But I can't give design
arguments
for that that will have as much impact as the
arguments
that I've learned from the economists, the epidemiologists and the environmentalists.
So these are the three
arguments
that I'm going to give you quickly today.
So the four main
arguments
supporting surveillance like this, well, the first of all is that whenever you start discussing about these revelations, there will be naysayers trying to minimize the importance of these revelations, saying that we knew all this already, we knew it was happening, there's nothing new here.
And it's time to begin thinking about it, even if the reason we're thinking about it is to construct
arguments
for why we shouldn't do it.
It is seldom, if ever, extended to equally important
arguments
around the fragility of our present system of government, to the notion that honesty, accuracy and impartiality are fundamental to the process of building and embedding an informed, participatory democracy.
It's so perplexing, trying to use
arguments
about evolutionary history to turn that into what we ought to do today.
RNG: How could a reasoned argument logically entail the ineffectiveness of reasoned
arguments?
And if you look at the history of moral progress, you can trace a direct pathway from reasoned
arguments
to changes in the way that we actually feel.
But just those
arguments
had to be made, and they were, in centuries past.
SP: Still, in every case, it took at least a century for the
arguments
of these great thinkers to trickle down and infiltrate the population as a whole.
Are there practices that we engage in where the
arguments
against them are there for all to see but nonetheless we persist in them?
We take drugs to shift the chemistries of our brains and to change our moods, and what are
arguments
or advertising or big ideas if not an attempt to influence someone else's mind?
They constantly use the argument to devalue rap and modern pop, and these
arguments
completely miss the point, because the dam has burst.
By the end of the 19th century, you can just write a geology textbook in which you make
arguments
about how old the Earth is.
BG: One of the
arguments
against your point of view is that economic inequality is not only a feature of capitalism but is actually one of its engines.
Back
Next
Related words
Their
About
There
Which
Would
Against
Should
Economic
Other
Political
Could
Being
People
Policy
Often
Without
World
Think
Right
While