Example collocations logo

Argue in sentence

2151 examples of Argue in a sentence

Negotiating a follow-up treaty to the Kyoto Protocol, they argue, requires that we seek even deeper cuts in the pollution that causes global warming.
Some people argue that deterrence does not work in cyberspace, owing to the difficulties of attribution.
Some argue forcefully that high levels of inequality can make sustained growth impossible, and may even contribute to recessions.
Rick Perry, the governor of Texas and an early frontrunner in the Republican primary, called it just a “theory out there,” while Romney himself has had to argue that it is consistent with creationism – the idea that an intelligent force designed the universe and brought it into being.
Companies like Expedia, Yelp, and TripAdvisor argue that Google searches are depriving their Web sites of valuable traffic, putting their businesses at a disadvantage.
As political scientist Victor Cha argued before the election, changes in regional capabilities, the emergence of new threats and challenges, and the diffusion of connectivity in the twenty-first century argue for a new, more multilateral security structure in Asia.
Many central bankers and economists argue that today’s rising global inflation is just a temporary aberration, driven by soaring prices for food, fuel, and other commodities.
While I would strongly argue that the FSA in my day did not favor firms unduly, it is perhaps true that we – and in this we were exactly like US regulators – were inclined to believe that markets were generally efficient.
I do not think so, and to argue as much devalues the efforts of many overworked and underpaid public servants around the world.
Progressive economists argue that the weakening of unions in the US, together with tax policies favoring the rich, slowed middle-class income growth, while traditional transfer programs were cut back.
Starting with Cavallo, Argentina’s boosters argue that these problems are transitory, and blame the country’s difficulties on turmoil in world financial markets and the US dollar’s excessive strength in relation to the Euro, which reduces Argentina’s export competitiveness.
These supporters also argue, with some justice, that Argentina’s crisis results in part from a self- fulfilling prophesy among creditors.
It is hard to argue with this as a general statement about decline: nothing lasts forever.
Critics who argue that fiscal stimulus in Japan failed in the past – leading only to squandered investment in useless infrastructure – make two mistakes.
Some might argue that it is Putin's revitalization of central power that is reactionary.
Our talent pool isn’t really a billion, some argue; it’s only the well off and middle class, maybe 300 million strong, who can afford to play sports.
Besides the standard selfish elements that define our preferences, they argue that people see themselves as members of “social categories” with which they identify.
Beijing attracts China’s leading political critics, while Jerusalem’s social critics argue for an interpretation of religion that holds people, rather than inanimate objects, sacred.
They argue that, given record-low borrowing costs of about 1%, increased capital spending by governments would effectively amount to the proverbial “free lunch,” yielding sufficiently high tax revenues that the debt/GDP ratio would not rise.
Some economists argue that, unlike past recessions, in which workers were temporarily laid off from an industry only to be rehired as the recovery picked up, job losses starting in 1991 were more permanent.
One can argue that the worst is yet to come – that there will be more inflation and unemployment down the road – and that, when they come, the euro area will collapse.
Some argue that the CBO’s initial forecast of the impact of repealing the individual mandate was overly dire, and that many Americans will purchase insurance even in the absence of a penalty.
Lawyers argue unpopular positions.
Those who argue that suicide bombers express understandable grudges have themselves sold out their freedom.
Indeed, some argue that the inventiveness and internationalism of a world networked by interests and shared causes is likely to be more resilient than one crammed into the artificial – and increasingly constraining – box of the national state.
(Republicans, however will argue for putting less pressure on Israel to compromise and more pressure on Iran.)
Developing countries will argue that their need for cheap energy to lift their people out of poverty is greater than rich countries’ need to maintain their often wasteful levels of energy consumption – and they will be right.
Some petroleum experts argue that world oil production will peak in a decade or so.
Others argue that governments should simply subsidize low-income workers’ wages.
Let capital come in, they argue, and investment and growth will take off.
BackNext