Argue in sentence

2151 examples of Argue in a sentence

Some argue that instability and turmoil in the Middle East will prevent us from implementing the rebalance.

But only the most extreme libertarian would argue that the money should be handed out without any policy guidance.

Yet some analysts now argue that the US is following in the footsteps of the United Kingdom, the last global hegemon to decline.

In this sense, the US-led international order could outlive America’s primacy in power resources, though many others argue that the emergence of new powers portends this order’s demise.

Blockchain’s boosters would argue that its early days resemble the early days of the Internet, before it had commercial applications.

Some observers argue that the US – a key target – could do more to project a positive image and negate terrorist propaganda.

Hope, they argue, is critical to aid recovery, and a bleak diagnosis should not be allowed to kill it.

It was once fashionable to argue that when China opened up to the world, Hong Kong and Singapore would suffer.

But one could argue just as easily that populist ideals are being absorbed into more mainstream political and economic agendas.

Russia, they argue, should form partnerships with more dynamic countries.

Many argue that, in both Russia and Europe, such social infrastructure has become so costly that it is hindering the development of a more efficient and dynamic economy.

Some argue for “helicopter money,” whereby the Fed prints money and hands it out.

In the recent Dutch election, liberals could argue for respecting the rights of immigrants because respect and tolerance are traditional Dutch values, of which any Dutch patriot can be proud.

Many argue that bankers’ belief that their institutions are too big to fail and that their jobs are safe encourages them to underestimate the risks that they assume.

They argue that the combination of physical protection and, in most cases, electronic safeguards (permissive action links, or PALs) means that their arsenals would remain secure, even if countries where they are stored or deployed were engulfed by violence.

They argue that with borrowing costs so low, deficit spending is virtually free, and we need not worry about high debt levels.

Many regard the UN's role as the guarantor of international law and legitimacy as self-evident, and now argue that its stature, undermined by the US-led invasion, must be quickly restored if the rule of law is to prevail internationally.

Many now argue that QE3’s effect on risky assets should be as powerful, if not more so, than that of QE1, QE2, and “Operation Twist,” the Fed’s earlier bond-purchase program.

Each side will argue its own version.

There will be those who argue that identifying the outlines of an eventual political solution is patronizing to Syrians.

Using this approach, it is possible to argue that the future of many Western economies, and that of the global economy, will be shaped by their ability to navigate four inter-related financial, economic, social, and political dynamics.

Opponents argue that carbon pricing would hurt economic growth.

Though nothing is yet known about the claim that Russia says it will present in the spring, there is no doubt that it will argue the opposite.

Now, one might argue that the dignified pomp of Queen Elizabeth II is preferable to the tawdry grandiosity of Silvio Berlusconi, Madonna, or Cristiano Ronaldo.

Some – in particular, the ever-cynical bankers – argue that it is too late for Europe to save itself.

Of course, wellbeing itself is hard to measure, so one could argue that it is better to approach the issue from the other direction, by identifying the factors that make us less well.

Of course, one could argue that the UK was particularly exposed to the bust, because financial services make up a large part of its GDP.

But, if the unemployment rate is then still relatively high – say, above 7% – some members of the Fed’s Open Market Committee may argue that the Fed’s dual mandate – low unemployment as well as low inflation – implies that it is too soon to raise interest rates.

Advocates of austerity argue that debt has a negative impact on growth; proponents of further stimulus counter that it is low growth that generates public debt, not the other way around, and that austerity in times of recession only makes things worse.

Related words