Users in sentence

986 examples of Users in a sentence

There are now 650 million digital news consumers, 580 million digital video consumers, and the country's largest e-commerce platform, Taobao, now boasts 580 million monthly active users.

But there's an important thing to remember here: even though companies pushed back, even though companies demanded, hey, let's do this through a warrant process, let's do this where we actually have some sort of legal review, some sort of basis for handing over these users' data, we saw stories in the Washington Post last year that weren't as well reported as the PRISM story that said the NSA broke in to the data center communications between Google to itself and Yahoo to itself.

So even these companies that are cooperating in at least a compelled but hopefully lawful manner with the NSA, the NSA isn't satisfied with that, and because of that, we need our companies to work very hard to guarantee that they're going to represent the interests of the user, and also advocate for the rights of the users.

ES: The biggest thing that an Internet company in America can do today, right now, without consulting with lawyers, to protect the rights of users worldwide, is to enable SSL web encryption on every page you visit.

All companies need to move to an encrypted browsing habit by default for all users who haven't taken any action or picked any special methods on their own.

I think the Internet that we've enjoyed in the past has been exactly what we as not just a nation but as a people around the world need, and by cooperating, by engaging not just the technical parts of society, but as you said, the users, the people around the world who contribute through the Internet, through social media, who just check the weather, who rely on it every day as a part of their life, to champion that.

I don't think we can have a democracy if we're having to protect you and our users from the government for stuff that we've never had a conversation about.

So I'm sad that Google's in the position of protecting you and our users from the government doing secret thing that nobody knows about.

And with the rise of social media and social networks in the early 2000s, the web was completely changed to a place where now the vast majority of content we interact with is put up by average users, either in YouTube videos or blog posts or product reviews or social media postings.

Facebook has 1.2 billion users per month.

As scientists, we use that to help the way people interact online, but there's less altruistic applications, and there's a problem in that users don't really understand these techniques and how they work, and even if they did, they don't have a lot of control over it.

So what I want to talk to you about today is some of these things that we're able to do, and then give us some ideas of how we might go forward to move some control back into the hands of users.

There's a lot of power that users don't have to control how this data is used.

So I think there's a couple paths that we want to look at if we want to give users some control over how this data is used, because it's not always going to be used for their benefit.

Observing our political process in action makes me think it's highly unlikely that we're going to get a bunch of representatives to sit down, learn about this, and then enact sweeping changes to intellectual property law in the U.S. so users control their data.

The problem is that the revenue models for most social media companies rely on sharing or exploiting users' data in some way.

It's sometimes said of Facebook that the users aren't the customer, they're the product.

And so how do you get a company to cede control of their main asset back to the users?

We can also look at things like allowing people to encrypt data that they upload, so it's kind of invisible and worthless to sites like Facebook or third party services that access it, but that select users who the person who posted it want to see it have access to see it.

And I say, absolutely, and for me, that's success, because as a scientist, my goal is not to infer information about users, it's to improve the way people interact online.

And sometimes that involves inferring things about them, but if users don't want me to use that data, I think they should have the right to do that.

I want users to be informed and consenting users of the tools that we develop.

And so I think encouraging this kind of science and supporting researchers who want to cede some of that control back to users and away from the social media companies means that going forward, as these tools evolve and advance, means that we're going to have an educated and empowered user base, and I think all of us can agree that that's a pretty ideal way to go forward.

My job at Twitter is to ensure user trust, protect user rights and keep users safe, both from each other and, at times, from themselves.

We wanted to give users the ability to add photos to their tweets.

And so it's not surprising, perhaps, that in July of this year, Shark Attack Mitigation Systems in collaboration with the University of Western Australia Oceans Institute made an announcement which captured the attention of the worldwide media and of ocean users worldwide, and that was around the development of technology to mitigate or reduce the risk of shark attack based on the science of what sharks can see.

Now usage notes involve very human decisions, and I think, as dictionary users, we're often not as aware of those human decisions as we should be.

In fact, their report states, "Unfortunately, we do not have much data on the passwords users choose under particular rules.

NIST would like to obtain more data on the passwords users actually choose, but system administrators are understandably reluctant to reveal password data to others."

This is a globe, and here you're actually listening to other users of Ocarina blow into their iPhones to play something.

Related words