Substance
in sentence
745 examples of Substance in a sentence
The distressing mood permanently circuited into the latter half of the story by screenwriter Ben Hecht reverberates in Andrews' tense performance as Preminger saturates the film in a relevantly prosaic
substance
of style.
A few years later, she resurfaces, conceding that she took a certain amount of dramatic licence but willing to cooperate with a film-maker to prove the
substance
of her allegations.
Although the
substance
matter doesn't belong amongst the other titles in the list, The Driller Killer often wanders on the thin border between trash-exploitation and art-house cinema, as it features voyeuristic elements (a gratuitous lesbian shower sequence) as well as sheer close-ups of blood-puddles and whirring drills.
If this were a film of substance, I would say that the scene was shown to add to the film's realism.
From the very beginning one can tell that this film is going to be a major head trip, and would likely be best watched while high on some manner of
substance.
There is no
substance
to this at all.
The execution, however, is all style and too little
substance.
Tom, idealistic, insensitive and naive is embraced by Audrey, emotionally more mature but more vulnerable, accepting his sometimes preposterous social and literary speculation as a sign of
substance
in comparison to the increasingly jaded and cynical world of her preppy friends.
I think that a lot of
substance
was lost due to the fact that the audience would get bored.
Now when the next couple of scenes contain about 25 instances of people being hit with things, and three fart/poop/gross-out jokes, any
substance
the film actually had is washed away - or shall i say clubbed to death by blunt objects.
I recommend this movie to anyone who likes action movies with
substance
or just good movies.
The message itself is vague, no technical details (in such a technological subject) to give it
substance.
The
substance
of this film is watered-down pseudo-philosophical tripe that is popular among the "free thinkers" of our time.
In his review of this film, Ebert said it was "a triumph of style over substance."
I can totally see why this movie might come across as totally lame; it has half- baked plot with a rather strange pace, underdeveloped characters, and a little
substance
overall.
Over the decades this particular type of Horror film has evolved, from classics like 'The Haunting,' which eschews the use of big effects for suspense and subtle scares to more recent hits like 'Poltergeist,' which does a great of mixing style and substance, still being very scary.
Ken Russell has always been a director that took his films into excesses with both style and subject matter but I found this so-called biography lacking any real
substance.
It could be great but there's a total lack of
substance
on the whole picture, on the killer itself, on the way the story is told, on the dialogues which are totally plane, and i hated, it started with the concept of one ''crew, one camera'', and was suddenly changed in the middle.
There also happens to be a little explosion, a little explosion caused by the cigarette that Luchino dropped when being pursued by surveillance for having an illegal substance, which doesn't particularly mix well with some fuel that got spilled.
You can always be sure the aura of the town of New Orleans can recall many Tennessee Williams plays of
substance.
"The Bet" could be described as a triumph of style over
substance.
But there isn't too much
substance
beneath the surface: all the leading figures are gorgeous without being lovable, and while the central sex scene is certainly quite erotic, I don't imagine you'd see anything quite so arousing by sticking a camera in any real couple's bedroom.
Lack of substance, and predictable mannerisms make this film an event only greater than a fly landing on my popcorn.
I was expecting a movie with no substance, lots of gore, poor acting, highly suspect character choices (you're driving away from a house full of crazy people!
Other creatures such as an alien, zombies, and Frankenstein's monster never get their full due because director Hickox can not slow the movie down enough to provide us with any kind of
substance
to hold a hat on.
Shows of this caliber may be born of their particular time, but their
substance
is timeless.
So many times gay films seem to lack real
substance
and can't get over the basic premise of dealing with being gay and using stereotypical characters.
All I saw was violence, murder, and drug abuse but no real
substance.
However, the length of the film causes one to believe that there is a lack of overall
substance.
People expecting jumpy thrills will probably be a bit disappointed, but I rather enjoyed the fact that there's a bit more
substance
to the story.
Back
Next
Related words
Which
There
Style
Movie
Would
About
Little
Abuse
Could
Their
Other
People
Without
Being
While
Story
Nothing
Great
After
Think
