Example collocations logo

Societies in sentence

2138 examples of Societies in a sentence

The future of our organizations, our companies, our societies hinges on your answer to these questions.
We need to leave behind these old, transactional, unsuitable, outdated models, and we need to adopt instead the shared collective relational responses that can support a family like Ella's, that can address an issue like loneliness, that can support people into work and up the skills curve in a modern labor market, that can also address challenges of education, of health care systems, and so many more of those problems that are pressing on our societies.
I want to introduce the Arabic language to young learners, foreign speakers, but most importantly help refugees integrate to their host societies through creating a bilingual learning system, a two-way flow of communication.
We don't fully understand the best way to manage our individual microbial societies, but it is likely that lifestyle changes, such as eating a varied diet of complex, plant-based foods, can help revitalize our microbial ecosystems in our gut and across the entire landscape of our body.
Life in the Arctic includes organisms living in the ice, zooplankton and phytoplankton, fish and marine mammals, birds, land animals, plants, and human societies.
So obviously, this is creating in societies that are all multiethnic, multi-religious, multicultural, this is creating a situation in which, really, it is much easier for the propaganda of these terrorist organizations to be effective in recruiting people for terror acts within the countries where these kinds of sentences are expressed.
For me it is clear that all societies will be multiethnic, multicultural, multi-religious in the future.
And for me it's a good thing that they will be like that, but I also recognize that, for that to work properly, you need a huge investment in the social cohesion of your own societies.
But although this may sound similar to some human societies, this organization doesn't arise from any higher level decisions, but is part of a biologically programmed cycle.
And without democracy, our societies will be nastier, our future bleak and our great, new technologies wasted.
In some societies, slaves could be part of a master's family, own land, and even rise to positions of power.
The slave trade had become an arms race, altering societies and economies across the continent.
From the skewed distribution of pawedness in cooperative animals, to the slightly larger percentage of lefties in competitive hunter-gatherer societies, we may even find that the answers to some puzzles of early human evolution are already in our hands.
With economic growth, countries and societies enter into a virtuous cycle of upward mobility, opportunity and improved living standards.
If growth wanes, the risk to human progress and the risk of political and social instability rises, and societies become dimmer, coarser and smaller.
So what I want to argue is there are ways in which we can expand that choice set and still benefit everyone else: the host states and communities, our societies and refugees themselves.
Only when we build sufficient, affordable public housing, when we invest in robust transportation networks to allow people to connect to each other both physically and digitally, that's when our divided cities and societies will come to feel whole again.
As societies, as cities, they are either water rich or water poor, energy rich or energy poor.
For nationalists, our modern societies are built on national grounds: we share a land, a history, a culture, and we defend each other.
In other words, I claim, if we really want to improve our judgment as individuals and as societies, what we need most is not more instruction in logic or rhetoric or probability or economics, even though those things are quite valuable.
Brexit teaches us many things about our society and about societies around the world.
It highlights in ways that we seem embarrassingly unaware of how divided our societies are.
It was a real shock to me, and it suggested that people like me who think of ourselves as inclusive, open and tolerant, perhaps don't know our own countries and societies nearly as well as we like to believe.
The specter of Brexit is in all of our societies.
For all of us who care about creating liberal, open, tolerant societies, we urgently need a new vision, a vision of a more tolerant, inclusive globalization, one that brings people with us rather than leaving them behind.
But we also have to be very aware that there are redistributive consequences, that importantly, low-skilled immigration can lead to a reduction in wages for the most impoverished in our societies and also put pressure on house prices.
It has to be about lifelong civic participation and public engagement that we all encourage as societies.
But while we encourage that around the developing world, we don't take those lessons home and incorporate them in our own societies.
But one hypothesis that I think emerges from a cursory look at that data is the idea that polarized societies are far less tolerant of globalization.
It's the societies like Sweden in the past, like Canada today, where there is a centrist politics, where right and left work together, that we encourage supportive attitudes towards globalization.
BackNext