Example collocations logo

Societies in sentence

2138 examples of Societies in a sentence

And there is one more norm of the patriarchal societies that is called obedience.
Ladies and gentlemen, this plight of millions of women could be changed if we think differently, if women and men think differently, if men and women in the tribal and patriarchal societies in the developing countries, if they can break a few norms of family and society, if they can abolish the discriminatory laws of the systems in their states, which go against the basic human rights of the women.
It may be taken for granted in Canada, in America, in many developed countries, but in poor countries, in patriarchal societies, in tribal societies, it's a big event for the life of girl.
And if you think about it, all these different societies have different geometric design themes that they use.
So gays and lesbians have been in society since societies began, but up until the mid-20th century, homosexual acts were still illegal in most states.
In fact, this was a key part of their success: not just ruling the societies they conquered, but becoming part of them.
The poorest and most backward societies are always those that put women down.
Capitalism is the greatest social technology ever invented for creating prosperity in human societies, if it is well managed, but capitalism, because of the fundamental multiplicative dynamics of complex systems, tends towards, inexorably, inequality, concentration and collapse.
Now, the first of these transformations is the basic structural change of the economies and societies that I've already begun to illustrate through the description of Beijing.
Worst of all, in some countries, medical societies influence accreditation bodies not to honor the ELAM degree, fearful these grads will take their jobs or reduce their patient loads and income.
It was, for land assets, which was the traditional form of assets in preindustrial societies, it was typically five percent.
Educating a girl will create equal and stable societies.
And what he said was that this mindset, this framework discovered by Bentham, was the key means of societal control for modern, Western societies, which no longer need the overt weapons of tyranny — punishing or imprisoning or killing dissidents, or legally compelling loyalty to a particular party — because mass surveillance creates a prison in the mind that is a much more subtle though much more effective means of fostering compliance with social norms or with social orthodoxy, much more effective than brute force could ever be.
Shouldn't this be rebuilt by the people with the largest stake, the societies in exile, the refugees?
So here's a general rule of thumb that I believe in: When societies have strong institutions, the difference that one good leader can make is limited, but when you have weak institutions, then just one good leader can make or break that country.
Governments and civil societies are experimenting with new approaches.
Well, first of all, they feed us and they also give us the oxygen we breathe, but plants are also the source of important, biologically active ingredients that we should be studying very carefully, because human societies over the millennia, they have developed important knowledge, cultural traditions, and important plant-based medicinal resources.
Our societies have become engines to create more GDP.
We need a better way to measure our societies, a measure based on the real things that matter to real people.
We've seen, in the Arab Spring, how countries like Tunisia were supposedly economic superstars, but they were societies that were seething with discontentment.
And remember, these are preliterate societies.
I remember my father receiving anonymous letters saying, "Your daughter is spreading Western culture in the honorable societies."
Which led one scientist to declare that altruistic punishment may be the glue that holds societies together.
In fact, I observed that America was fracturing into two distinct societies: a republic of dreams and a republic of fears.
Have they made our societies, both in Europe and in the United States, more resilient?
But for the past 50 years, we've run most organizations and some societies along the superchicken model.
By saying that we're going to fight for women's rights and fight extremism with bombs and warfare, we completely cripple local societies which need to address these issues so that they're sustainable.
We have no other option than to reclaim the message of human rights, the principles of our faith, not for us, not for the women in your families, not for the women in this room, not even for the women out there, but for societies that would be transformed with the participation of women.
We've traded floorspace for friends, we've traded stuff for connections, and the result is we are one of the loneliest societies there has ever been.
Surely, we need the same level of ambition if we're going to serve the most vulnerable in our societies.
BackNext