Shots
in sentence
1287 examples of Shots in a sentence
I had seen just one movie by Gus Van Sant so far,Elephant, and I can assure you that he kept all his mannerisms while doing this one.Once again he crosses time lines.Once again he uses weird filming techniques like the never-ending
shots
of people walking...maybe you like these filming techniques, I know I don't.
SPOILER ENDS I do admire the amazing courage and effort it must have taken the film crew to get some of the stunning
shots
they got.
So many people have taken
shots
at Platoon and Born On the Fourth of July among other calling them "leftist propaganda film."
but it was a boring boring movie, maybe because i have seen a cut version, because there where only two things that where a little splatter, one time where some ones cuts someone arm of and where some one
shots
an arm of, but that where the only things.
And then there's another thing that always kind of bothers me with this type of films: it doesn't matter how many dynamite-induced explosions take place in the middle of a pack of some 50 horses, never mind how many
shots
are being fired at the rabble on top of them, only the crooks get killed and the nags always go their way rejoicing in one piece.
What was even worse were the camera
shots
and sound.
There is no plot, and half the movie is fast flashing
shots
from football games.
Zoomed in shots, that gives you no overview of the games.
Chan director Phil Rosen, of whom I generally like most of his entries, uses lots of long
shots
with no action(like Charlie's initial walk into the house from outside).
But the film's opening
shots
make the rest of the film (which takes a spectacular nose-dive from then on) all the more disappointing as they are a promise of cinematic quality that's just never delivered, not even close.
An independent production released via United Artists, the film has a bizarre start (beginning with
shots
from the finale, followed by
shots
from the movie's midsection), yet it does have a certain needling power which most assuredly gets the viewer on Hayden's side.
The director filmed a screwball romantic comedy as if it were a dark, artsy film---weird camera angles, blue filtered shots, lingering, close up looks at raindrops.
In the absence of anything like an explanation for this guy's horrible behavior, we're given endlessly repeated clips of Kahn walking around and painfully long - supposedly contemplative -
shots
of his soulless buildings.Actually, some of the buildings are interesting but the thrust of the film asks us to think about the guy himself.
I would be ashamed to put out something with that bad of acting, effects and cheap video
shots
of the girls chests and how convenient the camera falls when something "paranormal" happens.
event the fact that some of the
shots
in the film show attractive naked women does not add any quality to it.
To go along with that scenery, any
shots
outside of the hospital immediately tell the viewer that they are not in Houston.
The movie which stars Lowe, is a music video with few lines of dialogue, slow moving
shots
and poorly done editing.
This movie is an exercise in slow moving shots, no script, close-ups, terrible edited, and a poorly developed plot.
Proof if ever more was needed, that an action movie, irregardless of its budget, can LOOK better with more setups (or cameras), closer shots, and many more cuts.
The movie itself is a padded stinkaroo....endless insect and wildlife
shots
make the viewer wanna die!
This seems to be one of the more obscure and less liked of the genre, though I honestly don't see anything in this that is much worse than that of Spy Hard or Hot
Shots.
Count the amount of
shots
they use before having to...oh wait that's right they never have to reload.
We get to see a bit of each teenager's lifestyle, but the entire project just came off as pretentious to me, whether it be the constant low angle
shots
of tree branches in the wind, or the black and white "interviews" with the students, there was nothing new or original showcased in this movie, and nothing I needed to see.
It all seem interesting and some decent
shots
and lots of promise, but ultimately muddled and irrelevant.
It's about an insider heist gone bad because "hot head-bad guy
" shots
a bum, and of course "do goody-bad guy" goes on a moral trip.
Secondly I don't think any part of the movie, apart from two
shots
from Copenhagen where none of the actors were in, were actually taped in Denmark.
The camera
shots
make it so that you can't see whats going on.
problem with this movie,and i felt it was a big problem,was the horrible CGI.it looks like they ran out of money and couldn't complete the the effects
shots.
A lot of high angle
shots
from inside a house in the suburbs.
The town square that is all we ever see of Quebec is a rather obvious flatly lit studio interior, giving many scenes an old TV miniseries look, as does director Jean Beaudin's reluctance to offer much in the way of long
shots
or even exteriors.
Back
Next
Related words
There
Movie
Camera
Scenes
Which
Would
About
Great
People
Where
Really
Their
Beautiful
Story
Other
Action
Scene
Director
Acting
Through