Example collocations logo

Sequels in sentence

460 examples of Sequels in a sentence

Nowadays, movies are either remakes or sequels, or plots that have been used in many different films.
All the sequels are putrid stink bombs that simply bought the name rights for marketing.
Words fail me whenever I want to describe my feelings about this movie (and the sequels)... Does it have flaws?
The sequels were pretty good too, but not as good as good as the original.
It found its audience and made enough money to spawn several sequels.
A highly entertaining movie, made many times better by the awful sequels that followed.
Kevin Tenney's "Night of the Demons" is an enjoyable horror film that reminds me a little bit "The Evil Dead".On Hallowen night,a group of teens throws a party in Hull House,an abandoned funeral home on the outskirts of town.Lead by Angela,they perform a seance-like ceremony and accidentally awaken the evil spirits that inhabit the place.One by one,the uninvited evil force possesses the teens,turning them into bloodthirsty demons."Night of the Demons" is a perfect horror film.It is scary,gory and pretty atmospheric.The characters are well-developed and the gore by Steve Johnson is pretty good.There is a gruesome impaling,a tongue being bitten off,fingers shoved into eye-sockets,etc.The scene,where Suzanne(Linnea Quigley)shoves a tube of lipstick through her nipple is a hoot.Give this one a look.Followed by two sequels.
There were sequels but the first three are the best: including this one, BLUE MURDER AT ST TRINIAN'S and later in color THE GREAT ST TRINIAN'S TRAIN ROBBERY.
The third entry in the "Stepford" franchise, but apparently the three made-for-TV obscure sequels are incredibly obscure and hard to trace down, whereas the 70's original as well as the blockbuster remake with Nicole Kidman are commonly known and very popular.
I can understand his concern, but as is always the case of sequels, you have to push the envelope even further to pass a previous entry.
This short, which won an Oscar, spawned two sequels and a TV cartoon show, has minimal animation but adelightful script (by Theodore Geisel aka Dr. Seuss) and aneven more memorable and enchanting main character.
so great, that seven horrible sequels had to be made.
By the way, the thing that really makes me nauseous about this movie is the fact that it's the ONLY film out of all the seven sequels thats related in any way to the original (not counting Howling IV (1988), which was a remake of the original, or in other words, a sequel based on the same novel).
Although I recently put this on my 10 worst films list, I have to say it's probably no worse than Burt Reynolds in "The Maddening" or any of the "Look Who's Talking" sequels.
Never saw the original movie in the series...I only hope it was a much better movie than this or the sequel made in the 1980's as if it is not how were these two terrible sequels even justified.
It seems that Disney, however, is trying to perfect the art of crappy straight-to-DVD sequels.
This is an example of why some films shouldn't have sequels, because the first film is usually best, and it is.
Disney has now made straight-to-video sequels to a good bunch of their many animated features.
Well, these ones aren't really sequels, as they are both set in between the events of the first film.
The first of these two straight-to-video films was "Beauty and the Beast: The Enchanted Christmas", which seems to be disliked by quite a few fans of its theatrical predecessor, but I think that can usually be expected with sequels.
When compared to other films in the genre there's a lot better out there such as Not Another Teen Movie, American Pie and its sequels , Scary Movie 1 & 2 etc.
Yes, talk about bad sequels.
I am a huge fan of the original Carlito's Way and when I heard about this, I thought it would be just like almost all the other sequels that come out in Hollywood.
Not saying all sequels are bad, but thats the problem with Hollywood these days, they make too many sequels and remakes and rush them.
I enjoyed "Hot Shots" and "The Naked Gun" and their many sequels, even when most people found them unbearable.
I'm not a huge Freddy Krueger fan,but that doesn't mean that I don't like Robert Englund and his other Nightmare on Elm Street movies.I think that Robert is a very good actor.Nobody plays a better Freddy Krueger than he does.But,no offense Robert, this movie sucked.The acting is terrible,the plot is really weak,and Freddy Krueger is the only part of the cast that's even worth watching.Sometimes sequels can be better than the first,such as the Friday the 13th franchise(I thought the remake was the best in the series.)But
Culkin is too old now, so you're suppose to STOP making sequels!
Just like the two needless sequels that followed this, this isn't even worth a laugh.
They they only carry the franchise name to drum up interest in the "sequels," I guess.
Like in so many sequels, the action starts right away with no explanations.
BackNext