Sequels
in sentence
460 examples of Sequels in a sentence
It's why when people do sequels, or rip off movies, you know, of a genre, they're ripping off the wrong thing.
It comes to something when the L W Talking
sequels
are better than this one.
But I figured that I would check out the
sequels
for The Swan Princess to see what they were like and unfortunately, this is the typical cartoon sequel that just disappoints more than entertains.
As in previous sequels, there's nothing here to really connect the films except for the monster, the witch and Ed Harley (Lance Henriksen).
I usually give
sequels
the benefit of the doubt and go easy on them.
Seriously Halloween
sequels
in general are nearly all rubbish, two was crap, three was stupid, four is alright, five is well five, H20 alright, Resurrection painful.
Yet, in many ways i find this to be the worst of a very bad bunch of
sequels.
The first 10 minutes of the movie makes fun of
sequels
and pg-13 movies.
This is just like "The Howling," how in the hell could
sequels
get milked out of this anorexic cow??? Save your money and get the "Texas Chainsaw Massacre" (just don't get any of its
sequels
though) or "The Evil Dead" or "Dawn of the Dead."
The last of the "Airport
" sequels.
None of the three
sequels
did justice to the highly entertaining original, but this particular film is nothing more than a shameless attempt to exploit the name of the "Magnificent Seven" and Bernstein's rousing music theme.
How
sequels
were produced is beyond me.
Well anyway, you can probably guess how the plot ends, I can't believe they made 3
sequels
to this movie.
It's obvious this film helped spurn Hollywood's need to churn out tired
sequels
to appeal to the masses.
It's true, no one really expects anything from
sequels.
I am a die hard disney fan and i just don't believe in
sequels
with disney movies.
Movies like these do not need
sequels.
Part of the advantage of Don Bluth moving away from Disney is that he didn't need to suffer their endless tirade of straight-to-video, poorly animated cash-in
sequels.
I don't mind sequels; sometimes they're better than the original.
They rented equipment, despite making
sequels
to this movie.
I am finding that I get less and less excited about Disney's
sequels
to movies.
Every original classic spawned a couple of sequels, at least, and after a while they even thought up the idea of making genuine monster stewing!
Unfortunately, this film is typical of the watering down of a good film by numerous
sequels.
For example, is Lance Henriksen that strapped for cash that he has to keep playing supporting roles in these god-awful "Pumpkinhead
" sequels?
Tonight I watched the "edited for FOX Network" version that was some sort of curious hybrid of several hyperactive
sequels.
As with many sequels, this one just doesn't have the quality or the impact of the original.
I'm just amazed the movie was actually ever released, it's an embarrassment to Disney, hell half their straight to video
sequels
are better than this!
The solution to their problems is to hire a similarly-skilled Ninja for themselves who, as it happens, turns out to be Nero's deadly enemy (played by Sho Kosugi, who appeared in two more
sequels
and is currently engaged in another!).
I hope to see more movies from Tucker and Chan in their separate endeavors, but not in any more Rush Hour
sequels.
I still have couple of books left, but they are either in transit or they are the
sequels
which I am not in a hurry to read.
Next
Related words
Original
Movie
First
Movies
There
Really
Sequel
Their
Which
Other
Better
About
Worst
Films
Think
Series
Horror
Should
Making
Great