Example collocations logo

Seemed in sentence

7070 examples of Seemed in a sentence

Nobody seemed interested in seeing this movie, only 3 were in the theater; two passed out after 10 minutes, and they were the lucky ones.
My wife picked it up because of the cast, but the storyline right since the DVD box seemed quite predictable.
The directing, editing, production, and script all seemed as though they had been done by junior high school students who don't know all that much about movies.
Plus, Stan and Ollie were a lot older and seeing these geriatric men taking pratfalls seemed sad, not particularly funny.
Even by the low standards of a National Lampoon movie, this one seemed especially boring and joyless.
It seemed that the movie was trying too hard to be "Something About Mary," but I didn't even like that movie and it still fell short of those standards.
James Brolin was great, but Paul's father seemed like he was trying too hard to be the Randy Quaid character from the National Lampoon's Vacation movies.
But for the last 10 years he seemed to have lost it.This film is just empty, nothing at all to wake us up from the deep sleep you sink into after the first 10 min.No sex, no blood(it's suppose to be about snuff?),no actors, no dialogs, just as bad as an 90'T.V film.It's even worse than his last cannibals and zombies epics.So Rest in peace Bruno, you will stay in our minds forever anyway, thanks to such unforgettable gems as:Zombi 3, Robowar,Rats, l'altro inferno,Virus, Cruel jaws and few others.So except if you want to see B Mattei possessed by jess Franco's spirit's new film, pass on this one.But if you don't know this nice artisan's career track down his old films and have fun.
Things seemed to happen, but with no explanation of what was causing them or why.
I admit, I may have missed part of the film, but i watched the majority of it and everything just seemed to happen of its own accord without any real concern for anything else.
Syriana swept the critics upon release and everything seemed to be raving about it.
Plus it turns what seemed to be the whole point of the movie, that you should stand up for a just cause on its head, by the already mentioned misdirection, and makes it into a point about the nature of revolutions, that was already made, and much better, by animal farm.
The supposedly Samoan girl didn't look or act Samoan at all, seemed more like the stock white female who has sex with anyone on a whim.
Besides being a strange copy of the first movie, this movies plot seemed tired and was uninteresting compared to the first movie.
It practically seemed to satirize itself, and to no entertaining effect.
This is a low-budget potboiler from 1936 that probably seemed very cool to audiences of the time... but seems awfully routine these days.
this seemed an odd combination of Withnail and I with A Room with a View.. sometimes it worked, other times it did not.
Again, maybe it symbolizes something, but the explosion at the end seemed very forced and out of place.
Great work, but for such movie it seemed like too much work, like the video part did't deserve all that great music.
While I respect what Anderson, an incredibly talented man did, the film seemed to have gotten lost in its own clever spirit.
Nobody has seemed to mention that this movie and the book it is based on are based in actual events that happened in Nebraska.
The characters were not developed at all, and there was no real cohesion in the plot which just seemed to go nowhere much.
The horses and the rest of the action seemed to be in slow motion even during the non-slow motion scenes.
The raspy voice-overs seemed amateurish to me.
I picked up this video after reading the text on the box, the story seemed good, and it had Keanu Reeves!
The opening scenes seemed pretty good.
That isn't to say it was all bad, the idea of the dating service in the grocery store seemed like pretty fertile material, but the director switched focus to the cliche'd "save the Mom-and-Pop store from the evil corporation guy".
It seemed to spend too much time being clever rather than telling a story.
The biggest problem was that Stiller's character's "development" really seemed to come from nothing - like your average school play, the writers knew where he started and where he ended, but didn't put enough stock into properly telling the middle bit.
I also hated the character changes, because it seemed like instead of solving mysteries, Shaggy and Scooby were now playing superhero, something they would've never had done in the movies or in the Scooby-Doo Where Are You? show.
BackNext