Example collocations logo

Sadly in sentence

1210 examples of Sadly in a sentence

You see, the trendy, infantile children that drunkenly roam the streets of Pacific Beach (where I live in San Diego)for the most part don't have souls, sadly, living in the very town in which many surf legends have been born.
Sadly, the film is crippled by the script.
Sadly you couldn't be more wrong.
Sadly to say, David didn't make many outlandish films like this, rather he used elements like this as an additive.
Sadly though, I have suffered through some absolute abominations and so I actually found Blood Lake to be comparably watchable, its myriad flaws not proving as bothersome as they might.
I thought I would watch the extras on the DVD and be amazed by this tale, of a group of performing arts students who had made their first movie which had become a cult hit and propelled all of the stars into Hollywood stardom, but sadly not.
Sadly, this was his last turn as Jack.
Sadly this movie could have been a showcase for the potential of more than just Yune, but it trips out of the gate and just continues falling farther and farther back until you don't even care how it ends.
Sadly, Rory is no longer with us.
What should have been a small, character-driven musical gets swallowed up in elaborate sets and costumes, and sadly much of Stephen Sondheim's score was cut.
I hope he can make a turnaround, but sadly, I do not think its going to happen.
It is some of Goulet's finest singing, Falk plays the perfect shallow friend, and Howe,the comic female, and the townsfolk tenor are fantastic.They convey all the romance of the musical, sadly lacking in the Gene Kelly version,(hampered by weak vocal performances and eccentric character portrayal, sorry Gene & Van).
Sadly, they get cast in utter crap like this.
This movie, sadly, is one of them.
Sadly, this is about as close as the Discovery Channel comes anymore to producing educational programming.
Sadly, however, both actors were pretty limp here--particularly Scott.
But sadly this is far from the case with this film which paints it's humor in extremely broad strokes and is often as superficial as the industry that it's supposedly parodying.
This one seems like a sequel to Submerged, in that Seagal is working as part of a team again (thus meaning that other actors get the bulk of the meaty action sequences) and this movie (sadly) is all over the place (plot-wise) as Submerged.
Sadly, it has kind of gone into obscurity, but an excellent movie nonetheless.
When his mother asked him who his friends were in a photo, he told her sadly when each of them had been killed.
The warnings sadly turned out to be reasonable, as the film is an unworthy final entry to Amicus' reign in the Horror-omnibus world.
It is a delight -- but a fair warning: it whets your appetite for more which, sadly, is not available.
But sadly it was ruined when every chav, tart and odd mental patient signed up.
Director Thomas Carter has a string of successful TV shows to his name, and sadly this supposed 'movie' screams 'TV' from every angle.
Yet here's the most unbelievable bit - read this and weep: given the opportunity to cast Richard E. Grant as potentially the most electrifying Sherlock Holmes in decades, our bumbling Watson of a casting director elects to cast him in the role of the villain, thus relegating the characterisation of Holmes to the usual mediocrity we have sadly come to expect.
Lou Diamond Phillips sadly signed his name to this train wreck of a "movie".
Sadly, this film falls short, even though every actor I've seen before (especially Ms. Ng, Ms. Yau and Mr. Tsang) has impressed me with their acting ability.
They seemed to have had a decent director of photography and the acting isn't bad but sadly the problem is the film as a whole is pointless, senseless garbage.
Sadly, the people behind this movie didn't know it.
Sadly, when it came to viewing the whole thing, the horror aspect was played more prominently than the comedy.
BackNext