Example collocations logo

Reviewers in sentence

470 examples of Reviewers in a sentence

I disagree with other reviewers who are too hard on the film.
Other reviewers on this website have blamed the mentality of the 1950s for the now-beyond-dated nature of the film.
I think that is the main reason so many male reviewers on this site think this is a terrific film.
Clearly, the majority of reviewers here saw a different film than the one I did.
Similarly, the filmmakers' methods undermine their intentions, if their intentions were in fact as noble as many of the other reviewers here seem to think.
Like other reviewers, I laughed at stuff that was probably not supposed to be amusing just because Woods was so damn funny.
I have an issue with reviewers who are constantly comparing characters on the screen with the actors who portray them.
let's go swimming!), and the ending, as other reviewers have mentioned, is baffling.
Some previous reviewers of this movie have either mistaken it for The Killer or Hard Boiled.
Just trust me, and all the other reviewers.
While not nearly as good as Hal Foster's comic strip, this film is not nearly as bad as some reviewers would have you believe.
Contrary to the other reviewers here, 'A Return to Salem's Lot' is a competent film by director Larry Cohen.
And, unlike other reviewers, I don't find Wilfred Brimley's narration annoying or distracting.
And in marked contrast with other reviewers I find silence just a bit boring when overdone.
Leaving the stereotypes aside, which the other reviewers have mentioned, I was more upset at the heavy-handed "lessons" in the movie.
I think this is a good film but not quite as great as some reviewers think.
I'm not sure what negative reviewers were expecting; I went in looking for the very rare high-budget 3D experience and got what I was looking for.
Earlier reviewers have focused on this film as a rip-off of 'Witness.'
Some reviewers seem to think this movie was not sufficiently faithful the book.
I think my fellow reviewers are overstating things a bit.
This is the first Sharpe film I've ever seen, and according to other reviewers it isn't the best.
As some other reviewers have commented this film seems to be unavailable as so many of the made for TV movies from the 70's are.
As for the comments and questions of one of the other reviewers - well, there aren't necessarily any particular answers but the point being, I guess, that life's like that - things are never quite as clear cut as cinema (especially Hollywood cinema) makes out.
Incidentally, I'd particularly recommend the longer version rather than the 108-minute version, as that fills in some of the plot gaps that other reviewers seem to be querying.
I have a feeling that most of the reviewers here have not read the text of "Mysterious Skin" by Scott Heim.
Despite the previous reviewers lack of familiarity with Weill his work has attracted interpretation by well known artists of the past and continues to do so e.g.
Do not believe the raving and ranting about this one, you will not find it shocking, or gross, or 'nauseating' as some other reviewers would have you believe.
This was an embarrassing episode which lacks the "punch" usually associated with great Twilight Zone twists.The story is already stated by other reviewers.
This ranks with "Too Serve Man" another "classic" which was nothing more than 25 minutes of fodder thrown on the screen just to set up a big 1 minute twist at the end.I guess some reviewers are just easy to please
I was amazed to see how many reviewers panned the Blue's Brothers and gave half-decent reviews to the Spice Girl's dreadful exercise in film making.
Back