Review
in sentence
1943 examples of Review in a sentence
This is my first
review
on IMDb.com and probably first ever written
review
of a film I've done of my own accord - not for some class assignment.
this is only the second time i have been moved enough to write a
review.
This is a strong recommendation to anyone who reads this
review
who has never seen the film Total Reality, don't waste your time and money renting this poor excuse for a film.
I cannot believe whoever wrote the
review
above was serious.
So, I decided to investigate the credibility of the good reviews, and I found that most of them are made by IMDb Users with only review, therefore relatives or friends of the cast and crew, or people hired to promote this garbage.
I also got sucked in by reading rave
review
after rave
review
from the national critics.
This
review
is for the UK DVD three-disc box set.
I try not to write spoilers but this
review
has one so be warned!! SPOILER ALERT!!!
How this ending could ever have made it through any kind of
review
by the producers is beyond me.
Franco Zeffirelli's ("The Taming Of The Shrew," "Romeo And Juliet," "Jesus Of Nazareth," "Othello") third stab at transferring Shakespeare to the screen works very well, with the casting of Mel Gibson ("Mad Max," "Lethal Weapon" and pre-"The Passion Of The Christ" notoriety) in the role formerly owned by Sir Laurence Olivier (and rightly so; see my
review
on his "Hamlet," arguably the best interpretation of one of the Bard's timeless (and most quoted) tragedies) and redone 5 years later by Kenneth Branagh as a full-bloodied treatment, explaining its 3 hour 22 minute running time, combined with a dream cast (and a lot of little additions, which were well-chosen and expertly done by the contemporary master of William Shakespeare, Kenneth Branagh, the director of "Henry V" and "Dead Again."
Joining the "Lethal Weapon" star are Glenn Close ("The Big Chill"), Paul Scofield ("A Man For All Seasons"), Alan Bates, Ian Holm, Michael Maloney (who would be cast as Roderigo opposite Kenneth Branagh and Laurence Fishburne in Oliver Parker's "Othello" (see my
review
of Olivier's "stage" version of the tragedy, though he only starred in it) and who Branagh would cast as Laertes in HIS 3-hour version of "Hamlet" (a proper homage to Sir Laurence Olivier and his classic version of the play; see my
review
on that one as well) 5 years later), Nathaniel Parker (who would be cast as Cassio in his brother's version of "Othello" 4 years later) and Helena Bonham-Carter, who would be cast in "Mary Shelley's Frankenstein" 4 years later.
The first
review
I saw of this on IMDB says that Vince Vaughn is a much better actor than Anthony Perkins was in this role.
It's tough to
review
Psycho if you don't have the perspective of how revolutionary the movie was in 1960.
I was fairly lenient with my
review
of Holocaust due to some actual attempt at a statement and style, but in Ferox's case there is no reason to watch this unless you solely get off on blood and gore.
I once read a brilliant
review
that referred to "Death Wish 3" as the pure definition of cinematic masturbation.
I had to write a
review
for this film after I saw it last night and read some of the comments of people trying to classify the displeasure of this film go down to wfmitchell's post)).
if this is your type of humor, i'd say you haven't really had much of a life... consider your appreciation of this film a symptom... and PLEASE don't EVER write another review...i have a tendency to believe them when they're unanimous.
Like another ticket buyer I saw a nice cute poster about this film, it's five star review, and awards won.
I sat on this
review
for a week and yes, I still think the movie should never have been made.
Why would any critic bother to
review
a film like this?
After seeing PURELY BELTER I came onto this site to
review
it , but not only that I also had to check out the resume of the screenwriter / director Mark Herman .
Every
review
of the film basically said that this movie was so bad that it would make you bleed from the eyes to watch it.
I mean whats spelling got to do with a movie
review?
Upon writing this
review
I have difficulty trying to think of what to write about.
I'll dispense with the obvious
review
of factual inaccuracies.
I read the
review
in the newspaper and went to see this movie with the expectation of having a good Woody Allen experience (as I've had many times in the past).
The fact that I am writing this
review
feels like an insult to my fingers, this film should be thrown in to the dustbin rather than be reviewed.
It is not generally my practice to
review
movies that I dislike to any great degree.
It makes me very nauseous that people like this garbage, (A
review
I just read said it was, "very funny," sickening, isn't it).
Even Ebert's written
review
gave it a full four stars!
Back
Next
Related words
Movie
Which
About
Would
Write
First
There
After
Their
Other
Should
Could
People
Writing
Before
Really
Never
Movies
Reading
Watch
