Remake
in sentence
945 examples of Remake in a sentence
Back when Alec Baldwin and Kim Basinger were a mercurial, hot-tempered, high-powered Hollywood couple they filmed this (nearly) scene-for-scene
remake
of the 1972 Steve McQueen-Ali MacGraw action-thriller about a fugitive twosome.
As for the action scenes, they're pretty old hat, which causes one to wonder: why even
remake
the original?
Two qualifiers right up front: I actually think Joe Don Baker can be good or even great with the right material and the right director (the "Cape Fear" remake, a small role in "Goldeneye", "Walking Tall").
The
remake
takes the original and stands it on its head.
How 'bout a
remake
of Creature, but 50 years older!
Well, finally got to see the
remake
last night in London, unintentionally hilarious, sexless and devoid of any real humour.
It's such a weird
remake
that I cant quite believe I saw it, it reminded me of something that The Comic Strip presents would have done in the eighties, a bit like their Hollywood interpretation of the Miner's Strike, very strange!
I love Vince Vaughn but he ends up more annoying that funny here and the film is more than less a
remake
of the crappy 80's classic " Santa Claus the movie" but with out the camp or the bad Sheena Easton song at the end.
Why Hollywood feels the need to
remake
movies that were so brilliant their prime (The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, The Hills Have Eyes) but is it considerably worse why Hollywood feels the need to
remake
those horror films that weren't brilliant to start with (Prom Night, The Amityville Horror) Much like their originals these remakes fail in creating atmosphere, character or any genuine scares at all.
The Omen
remake
from 2006 is much worse, even more pointless than this, so I guess it has that.
Another thing, it's a
remake
of what is supposed to be a classic.
This miserable film is a
remake
of a 1927 film.
I read somewhere where this film was supposed to be a
remake
of the 1949 film noir, "Criss Cross."
As has been stated countless times, "The Hills Have Eyes 2" is NOT a
remake
of the (generally disregarded) mid-'80s sequel to Wes Craven's 1977 original.
Not only are the characters (in this case, a gang of goofball National Guards(wo)men sent to investigate the turbulent hills of the original remake) completely obnoxious and prone to really annoying genre pitfalls (played without a lick of irony, mind you), but they are constantly cracking jokes that aren't funny.
I basically picked up this movie because I had seen Kitano Takashi's brilliant
remake
of Zatoichi and was in the mood for another updated samurai tale which also starred Asano Tadanobu.
It's too bad nobody has figured out how to make this movie as well as it was first made, but then again it's too bad we live in a culture where we feel like we need to
remake
amazing things instead of simply learning to savor the originals.
The biggest problem with Varma's
remake
is that he doesn't even try to make a credible film.
How you wish he'd pulled the trigger and spared us all the agony.Not only does Ramgopal Varma Ki Aag fail as a
remake
of Sholay, it's a pretty bad effort even as a stand-alone film.
It's not like Varma hasn't handled a
remake
before.
There is no any philosophical depth in the film, and this is like a
remake
of Darkman 2 which it still cannot equal.
The first movie that was a
remake
of the Disney cartoon classic starring Glenn Close as Cruella De Vil, it seemed like a sure hit, but it was just a bomb.
I, like many other Bachchan fans, having been eagerly awaiting the
remake
of Sholay.
Ram Gopal's
remake
is not worthy of the title.
How the Grinch Stole Christmas was a wonderful little Christmas cartoon that anyone could easily enjoy, I never did see the reason for a
remake.
Not to mention a
remake
that was made with humans, the cartoon was just perfect enough, what's the purpose of this film?
I've actually seen the remake, directed by Blue Kite director Zhuangzhuang Tian.
I have no idea why Scorsese wasted his time on a
remake.
And considering Spielberg wanted to do the remake... could have been far worse.
The acting was bad, the script was bad and the ending was just terrible...the only good comment i could make about this movie would be the special effects and make up...but apart from that...this movie would be one of the worst movies of 2001...why on earth did they have to
remake
such a perfect movie and ruin it...why!!!!
Back
Next
Related words
Movie
Original
Classic
Would
Which
About
Story
There
First
Better
Really
Years
Version
Think
Horror
Great
Could
Their
Should
Movies