Regulators
in sentence
982 examples of Regulators in a sentence
One option would be a small access-to-market fee that could be collected by pharmaceutical
regulators
in large markets.
Both economic theory and past experience show that scattered national
regulators
who face conflicting pressures cannot efficiently manage such crises.
These trends imply an increased probability that the market is underestimating risk, so systemic risk
regulators
should raise minimum capital requirements as soon as they spot them.
There are many reasons why the market fails to correct systemic error, including that booms are always founded on a belief by both
regulators
and bankers that “this time it is different.”
The lesson for
regulators
is simple: capacity for risk is related to the maturity of funding, not to what an institution is called.
In much the same way that cigarette companies shifted their focus to the developing world when
regulators
clamped down on their marketing practices in America, fast-food companies seem to be trying to capitalize on those portions of the global consumer base that have little exposure to health campaigns in their native languages.
In some countries, we still see a troubling combination of old reactors and weak
regulators.
What should monetary policymakers do when
regulators
are prone to falling down on the job?
To what indicators should they look when determining whether
regulators
have failed to do their part?
There was also bureaucratic resistance from existing
regulators.
Globally, the health IT industry should not wait to be forced by government
regulators
into doing a better job.
Furthermore, as Harvard’s Jeffrey Frankel has pointed out,
regulators
increased margin requirements several times this year, making it harder to buy stocks with borrowed money.
If buying dollars is not sufficient to stem the appreciation tide,
regulators
in emerging economies will erect an array of other barriers to keep money out.
The idea is simple: banks should be pressured to issue a new kind of debt that automatically converts into equity if the
regulators
determine that there is a systemic national financial crisis, and if the bank is simultaneously in violation of capital-adequacy covenants in the hybrid-security contract.
It was also the West European financial
regulators
and supervisors who, under “home rule,” were supposed to discourage these excesses.
So much money was pumped into the economy and so lax were
regulators
that one leading American bank advertised its loans with the slogan “qualified at birth” – a clear indication that there were, in effect, no credit standards.
Big Tech Is a Big ProblemCAMBRIDGE – Have the tech giants – Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Google, and Microsoft – grown too big, rich, and powerful for
regulators
and politicians ever to take them on?
The problem for
regulators
is that standard anti-monopoly frameworks do not apply in a world where the costs to consumers (mainly in the form of data and privacy) are thoroughly non-transparent.
European
regulators
are showing one possible path forward, even as US
regulators
continue to sit on their hands.
Of course, the US Congress and
regulators
need to rein in Big Tech in many other key areas as well.
Regulators
and politicians in the homeland of Big Tech need to wake up.
They established the system of ideas that bankers, politicians, and
regulators
applied.
That is why smart
regulators
charged with ensuring healthy competition, like the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority, use a “sandbox” approach to enable testing of new technologies and business models without a crushing burden of regulation.
But it is well known that GDP growth does not account for environmental externalities.All of this underscores the importance of how
regulators
regulate.
All of this underscores the importance of how
regulators
regulate.
Policies must not be based on the fiction that good loans were made, and that the business acumen of financial-market leaders and
regulators
will be validated once confidence is restored.
The incidence of malaria could be reduced drastically by the judicious application of the mosquito-killing chemical DDT, but UN and national
regulators
have curtailed its availability, owing to misguided notions about its toxicity.
The CSRC, as China’s capital-market regulator, together with other regulators, neglected to fulfill their proper mission: to create a robust institutional framework capable of sustaining strong investment.
Even as stock-market indices moved well beyond reasonable bounds,
regulators
failed to predict the boom’s speed and scale.
In order to protect the interests of investors better, China now must find ways to ensure such cooperation among its existing financial regulators, including by revamping the relevant institutions.
Back
Next
Related words
Financial
Banks
Their
Should
Which
Other
Market
Would
Capital
Crisis
System
Central
Bankers
Risks
Markets
Could
Government
National
Rules
Investors