Regulators
in sentence
982 examples of Regulators in a sentence
The underlying problem, though, is that both
regulators
and bankers continue to rely on mathematical models that promise more than they can deliver for managing financial risks.
Although
regulators
now place their faith in “macro-prudential” models to manage “systemic” risk, rather than leaving financial institutions to manage their own risks, both sides lumber on in the untenable belief that all risk is measurable (and therefore controllable), ignoring Keynes’s crucial distinction between “risk” and “uncertainty.”
Salvation does not lie in better “risk management” by either
regulators
or banks, but, as Keynes believed, in taking adequate precautions against uncertainty.
But what structures should
regulators
seek to encourage?
But tying executive payoffs to long-term results does not provide a complete answer to the challenge facing firms and
regulators.
Recognizing the value of tying executive payoffs to the effects of executives’ choices on non-shareholders highlights the important role of bank
regulators
in this area.
LONDON – Relationships between London banks and their
regulators
are not especially warm just now.
Even more aggressive criticism has been advanced about American
regulators
– and, indeed, about Congress – alleging that they were in the pockets of investment banks, hedge funds, and anyone else with lots of money to spend on Capitol Hill.
Regulators
are typically not subject to those temptations.
This is more prevalent in the US, where regulators’ salaries are very low, especially in the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
The United Kingdom pays its
regulators
more, but there is still a lot of “in and out” activity, and more than there used to be.
Their
regulators
are given market-related compensation packages, and continuity of senior staff is more effectively maintained.
While I would strongly argue that the FSA in my day did not favor firms unduly, it is perhaps true that we – and in this we were exactly like US
regulators
– were inclined to believe that markets were generally efficient.
That has been a grave lesson for
regulators
and central banks.
But were
regulators
surrogate lobbyists for the financial industry?
The political backlash that ensued from the bail-in triggered a blame game between the government and the opposition parties, and even between politicians and regulators, with all blaming the European Union and its banking regulations.
First, it does not require government
regulators
to decide how much individual assets are worth, because private markets value toxic assets.
Think tanks, lobby groups, and national
regulators
have wasted no time in trying to influence Hill's efforts, and to head off any initiatives that might damage their interests.
Most
regulators
and market participants agree that Europe's financial markets are dysfunctional.
“Colleges” of regulators, the supposed solution, are inadequate.
New modes of governance, ranging from transnational networks of
regulators
to international civil-society organizations to multilateral institutions, are transcending and supplanting national lawmakers.
For example, American, European, Japanese, and other drug
regulators
have developed guidelines, through the International Conference on Harmonization, that take advantage of their collective expertise.
Nor do the memoranda of understanding drawn up by national financial
regulators
offer hope of salvation.
But, as the 2008 global financial crisis starkly demonstrated, it can render markets dysfunctional, with ambiguity about different regulators’ responsibilities making it difficult, even impossible, to address the problems caused by failing firms.
Foreign investors must bribe
regulators
to start joint ventures.
European health-care
regulators
are often hesitant to implement structural reforms.
Regulators
could encourage each bank to sell part of its toxic portfolio and extrapolate the portfolio’s value from the price obtained in such a sale, or they could attempt to estimate the portfolio’s value as well as they can on their own.
After a crackdown by Asian
regulators
this month, cryptocurrency values fell by 50% from their December peak.
But, like in the case of the sub-prime bubble, most US
regulators
are still asleep at the wheel.
While G20 leaders have already given a nod to some of these reforms, a far wider range of officials, regulators, and investors, across many local, national, and regional jurisdictions, must do the difficult work to deliver results.
Back
Next
Related words
Financial
Banks
Their
Should
Which
Other
Market
Would
Capital
Crisis
System
Central
Bankers
Risks
Markets
Could
Government
National
Rules
Investors