Regulators
in sentence
982 examples of Regulators in a sentence
Regulators
have struggled with the problem for years without finding a solution.
The Bank of England has described the way in which remuneration policy can create risks for banks and said that, as a result, “it is of increasing interest and concern to supervisors and regulators.”
And the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO), which sets standards for exchanges and securities regulators, has name recognition in some quarters.
The FSF was not a scary creature, and the individual regulators, national and international, were largely left to their own devices, with all of the unhappy consequences with which we have become acquainted.
They would also record that pressure from the FSB has accelerated the work of sectoral
regulators.
It can neither instruct the other
regulators
what to do (or not do) nor force member countries to comply with new regulations.
Bureaucratic bodies, autonomous regulators, and independent courts set policies, or they are imposed from outside by the rules of the global economy.
Fukushima exposed the need for
regulators
to perform regular stress tests, evaluating the ability of nuclear facilities to stand up to various contingencies affecting their safety.
Regulators
should conduct similar evaluations aimed specifically at assessing facilities’ ability to withstand security threats, including theft by knowledgeable insiders.
But this is exactly what the Dodd-Frank legislation said – and it is what the FDIC and other
regulators
have worked hard to implement.
The second problem with the bankruptcy approach is that international
regulators
would find themselves unable to cooperate – for their own legal and procedural reasons – with a US process that affects a major part of their own economies.
Whereas
regulators
worry that the merger would lead to higher prices, AT&T argues that it is facing direct competition from tech giants like Netflix and Amazon, which both offer online video streaming and original programming.
And it was not just the bankers who were in the Davos doghouse this year, but also their
regulators
– the central bankers.
Regulators
have proposed steep hikes: a Bank of England study, for example, suggested a more than three-fold increase.
Regulators
relied mainly on examination of individual loans rather than capital-to-asset ratios.
Regulators
then shifted to edicts requiring banks to maintain a specified capital cushion, thick enough to cover potential losses.
They complain bitterly about regulators’ “interference” with the free market, property rights, and the sacrosanct ideal of home ownership.
Thus, the political economy of housing finance limits regulators’ ability to do the right thing.
The risk can never be reduced to zero, but the stress testing carried out by
regulators
shows that most major banks can now survive very extreme economic shocks.
Given the magnitude of the task, however, it is important also to ensure effective coordination and harmonization of these efforts with the relevant standard-setters, regulators, and professional organizations.
As rules are created to manage how countries interact,
regulators
must work to ensure that digital-trade policies do not exacerbate the inequities that the traditional trading regime has exposed.
Indeed, high-tech companies like Microsoft and Intel are particularly unsuitable targets for antitrust policing, because
regulators
cannot possibly move at the speed of ‘Internet time.’
Regulators
contribute no value to this high speed evolutionary process.
Yet
regulators
persist in trying to inject themselves into these fields, with antitrust authorities claiming that they are ripe with anti-competitive practices and exercises of “undue market power" by the most successful market participants.
But governments in developing countries are often accustomed to controlling all aspects of their economies and tend not to want
regulators
to promote competition.
Thus, even when regulatory agencies are crucial to encouraging competition in telecommunications,
regulators
are often given control over areas where there is no particular reason for government oversight.
It should be positioned at the center of international financial markets and provide an analytical platform, not only for central banks and finance ministries, but also for regulators, standard setters, and market participants.
This would enable it to identify macroeconomic threats to stability and encourage best practices for supervisors and
regulators.
The poor performance of Wall Street and America
regulators
has cost America a good deal in terms of the soft power of its economic model’s attractiveness, but the blow need not be fatal if, in contrast to Japan in the 1990’s, the US manages to absorb the losses and limit the damage.
European
regulators
have already introduced sophisticated monitoring and surveillance programs, blocked market access to countries with a record of illegal fishing, penalized European rogue operators, and helped support “yellow or red carded” countries reform their fisheries laws.
Back
Next
Related words
Financial
Banks
Their
Should
Which
Other
Market
Would
Capital
Crisis
System
Central
Bankers
Risks
Markets
Could
Government
National
Rules
Investors