Rational
in sentence
726 examples of Rational in a sentence
Admittedly, Hamas is no easy enemy, but neither is it immune to
rational
political calculations.True, its leader, Khaled Mashaal only recently declared in Tehran that “our aim is liberating all of Palestine from the River to the Sea.”More than once, however, he has also made conciliatory declarations.
Such is the tyranny of the majority in post-referendum Britain that a “Remainer” proposal for
rational
debate and persuasion is considered an insurrection.
Instead of vainly trying to influence May’s hardline stance in the negotiations, the new priority should be to restart a
rational
debate about Britain’s relationship with Europe and to convince the public that this debate is democratically legitimate.
This requires that a more
rational
strategy be mapped out in the planning of major industrial projects and energy-hungry enterprises.
Assuming that you are rational, you must calculate that you may be a member of a cultural minority.
Individually
rational
choices were giving rise to collectively irrational results.
Trump’s actions are being “explained” as
rational
and even bold, whereas they more likely are manifestations of severe psychological problems.
So what is unfolding before our eyes is not a
rational
discussion of economics but pure haggling.
Recent developments in the Netherlands have also shown that euthanasia is discussed more in the context of autonomy, control, and
rational
choice rather than of uncontrollable medical symptoms.
That is both logical and
rational
– and thus not something that the US Federal Reserve can offset with unconventional monetary easing.
Given the broad range of threats facing marine life – including overfishing, climate change, pollution, and coastal development – it is easy, perhaps even rational, to be pessimistic.
Unfortunately, human fallibility seems to be working against such a
rational
solution.
Well-educated Chinese should understand that destroying Japanese cars (which are made in China) and similar behavior are not
rational
ways to express an opinion about a territorial dispute with Japan.
In a world in which announcing new policies – and thus moving markets –is as easy as sending a tweet, politics will trump
rational
economic discussion.
First, no one has ever been able to explain satisfactorily the October 1929 market collapse in terms of a
rational
cause, with market participants reacting to a specific news event.
When this new bankruptcy law was passed, no one complained that it interfered with the sanctity of contracts: at the time borrowers incurred their debt, a more humane – and economically
rational
– bankruptcy law gave them a chance for a fresh start if the burden of debt repayment became too onerous.
The very institution in which I sit, the House of Lords, has no
rational
justification in terms of its composition or powers, as reformers have been quick to point out.
But surely there can be a balance between Second Amendment rights and
rational
constraints on the ability of mentally unstable people to accumulate arsenals.
Even Defense Minister Ehud Barak, usually a coolly
rational
thinker, chose Yad Mordechai, a Kibbutz named after Mordechai Anilewitz, the leader of the Warsaw Ghetto uprising, to alert world opinion against “Holocaust deniers, first and foremost the Iranian president, who calls for the destruction of the Jewish people.”
It might be fashionable to talk about just a couple of the globe’s challenges, but we could achieve a lot more if we focused first on where our spending would be most
rational.
Instead, he cleverly ignored Khrushchev’s threats, and instead responded to a letter that showed the Soviet premier as a
rational
leader negotiating for parity in world affairs.
The danger is that scientific decisions with a scientific-technical component are no longer subject to study or
rational
argument, but instead are fought over by various interest groups, with some invariably claiming that their taxes should be used to fund only research that is compatible with their values.
Mainstream economics tends to focus on the equilibrium-seeking behavior of homo economicus, guided by
rational
choice, when marginal benefits equal marginal costs.
Competition for prestige, even when the contest is economic, is not a purely
rational
undertaking.
The fundamental problem is that a generation of mainstream macroeconomic theorists has come to accept a theory that has an error at its very core: the axiom that people are fully
rational.
They update these probabilities as soon as new information becomes available, and so any change in their behavior must be attributable to their
rational
response to genuinely new information.
And if economic actors are always rational, then no bubbles – irrational market responses – are allowed.
To be sure, the purely
rational
theory remains useful for many things.
But nowhere are bubbles modeled: the economy is assumed to do nothing more than respond in a completely
rational
way to these external shocks.
By participating actively in politics, basing their electoral choices on
rational
self-interest, and developing the sense of moderation needed to resist dictatorship, the middle class promotes democratic progress.
Back
Related words
Would
Their
Which
People
There
Economic
Should
Could
About
Other
World
Might
Think
Expectations
Thought
Political
Behavior
Always
Policy
Being