Quality
in sentence
4328 examples of Quality in a sentence
I enjoyed the original "American Psycho"; shame they've destroyed any chance of a
quality
sequel.
The acting is not very good (the actors are very stiff and seem to be reading verbatim from cue cards, the
quality
of filming and cinematography is pretty poor, and the plot literally does not make sense (why do they need to train women to be human animals if they just want someone's kidneys?
I've seen lots of low
quality
material.
It all just adds to the rough-n-ready
quality.
Wanted my money back, tried to get it back and was given it back when I said the
quality
of the tape was so poor it looked like a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy recorded off a machine with dirty heads that were fifteen years old.
I would expect this
quality
from maybe a high school film class, but I consider it a horrible injustice that it has made it onto the shelves of a movie rental store.
Linda Blair went on to a career that seemingly matched the
quality
of this movie.
Ghost Lake, Aquanoids, Evil Cult, The Day The Darkened Arise--that's some
quality
bad cinema.
The
quality
of the actors that take part in this movie was only possible because they are friends in real life and didn't see the movie as a commercial product in the first place.
It also saddened me that any one those
quality
actors, involved in this film, actually allowed it to be released.
Rarely do i watch a foreign action movie that has the
quality
of this one.
Imagine 3-7
quality
well thought out "true" indies could have been funded for this and they would have given society something.
movie has none of the style of the second movie.adding it all up,this third installment in the series is much lower in
quality
on all counts.my
Speedy Gonzales was essentially a one-note character (kind of like the Roadrunner) so the
quality
of a Speedy cartoon is largely dependent on the surrounding characters and situations they get themselves into rather than Speedy himself.
!) is of questionable
quality.
I knew this would end up being a film of high
quality
and laughter.
I thought at first I just had a dud.I wasn't able to get a refund only an exchange for the same stupid movie, and the next factory sealed one also skipped in the same exact spot so obviously the master copy is bad and has been transfered to all of the discs.I won't buy or rent anything again by this no-name new filmmaker and hope other's don't make the same mistake unless you like bad quality, grainy B-rated films made by a guy and his friends with a cheap hand held video camera.It is nothing more then someone's student film.All the money was spent on deceiving us with interesting looking cover art and a nice animated main menu.This is the only reason I even gave the movie a 2 out of 10.That is all this movie has going for it.It's a shame because I wanted to like this film but could never sit through it again.Now i've lost 14 bucks that could have been spent on something else.I feel ripped off!
It is an inde film so the
quality
is not as good as a 100 million dollar budget film, but its heart is in the right place and accomplishes to do what movies should do, entertain.
I know that if you went through every show ever made in the world you would probably find some old shows from the 1970s or something made in Croatia with a budget of about five dollars that are maybe even worse but considering the
quality
of shows we have in North America and the fact there is a real budget, etc, with this show being available in like thirty million homes, then the amount that this show was a total fail really becomes apparent.
Certainly it is worthwhile to repeat the complaint that the racist producers of this shameful exploitation of a beloved book series and it's author's good name to make money with no concern for
quality
or pleasing viewers.
However, one problem I had with it (besides its general low quality) was the fact that the cast the cats as the criminal buffoons.
That is the only redeeming
quality
of this strange movie with an odd, confusing story featuring odd confusing characters.
But 'Metropolitan' is actually quite delightful, in fact because of the very
quality
of the dialogue - the characters are elegant show-offs, which gives the writer the freedom to indulge them with clever lines.
The digital
quality
of the bugs was just appalling.
I don't know how a movie can actually DEGRADE its digital
quality
to actually get worse from the original which came out IN THE 90'S, and having bugs that are stupidly specialized, like the "Grenade" bug and the stupid fricken scorpion thing that shouldn't exist.Not to mention the terrible sound effects, it was almost as if someone had overlapped the same sounds and used sounds from 30 years ago to fill in space.
You just don't see
quality
or realism like that these days.
I would like to preface these comments by saying that I saw this movie on a poor
quality
double feature DVD (paired with Andy Milligan's "CARNAGE") that I picked up at the dollar store, so I honestly wasn't expecting much from CLASS REUNION MASSACRE (aka "THE REDEEMER: SON OF Satan!") from the get-go.
I read some reviews of the film on this site and several others before viewing it, and I noticed a lot of comments about its "dreamlike" or "surreal
" quality.
After watching the movie, I wonder how much of that "dreamlike
" quality
was intentional and how much was just dumb luck on the director's part.
Also, while Brad Pitt is gorgeous to look at, and a very likable movie star, his performance somehow left me a little cold - it doesn't hit any deep emotional chords, and while you could praise him for being subtle, he just doesn't have the everyman quality, that sense of human anguish anyone can relate to, that someone like Will Smith does.
Back
Next
Related words
Movie
Their
Which
Education
About
There
Would
Improve
Other
Could
Acting
People
Health
Films
Should
Really
Production
Better
While
Countries
