Example collocations logo

Quality in sentence

4328 examples of Quality in a sentence

"Ordeal" is a quality television film from 1973 with a very good cast and great production values.
There are very few horror films in which I can find no redeeming quality - and "Ghost Lake" has the dubious honour of being one of them.
The misgivings continued through the credits when I saw a cast of names that, although recognizable, hardly signal quality in a motion picture.
Wesley also does a credible job if you can call it that with this scrip, though I use the term credible lightly because he should have his head read for choosing this script ! the story line is so full of holes, and pointless narrative its a waste of time me even writing about it, as a snipes fan I watched this, and recently with the likes of Zig Zag, Undisputed and then Unstoppable coming from Wesley I was hoping for an upturn in quality, but yet again he failed me with this film, so poor I can't believe I wrote this much about it !!
The only elements left to enjoy near the end are the creepy music and young Adam Taylor Gordon's impressive acting performance which easily surpasses the quality of his lines.
Cats and Dogs will do wonders for the return of quality family films.
The first way it tries to do this is by jumping from camera to camera(all of which are at an unsettling angle) and from normal film quality to CCTV-esquire film.
Alright, about my rating first: I realize that this movie is not 10/10 quality, for it is a good one, but we have all seen better.
Actually, the sound is terrific, the video certainly not DVD quality but passable for someone who had enjoyed it as a child.
The graphics MM2 shows are of extreme high quality.
The problem was that these companies were operated on shoestring budgets and they simply couldn't afford to make polished and high quality films.
This movie gets a 5 out of 10 not because it deserves five points, in fact, I don't think the quality is such that it deserves one point.
Bruno Mattei known for many exploitation gems of low quality but high entertainment ( at least for this person) unleashes probably as good a cannibal movie you could put out today.
Many other 1920's shows have not, principally because of the quality of the scripts, although their songs remain famous and popular.
The film isn't dated and the dvd transfer is good so check it out if you're looking for something a little different, something of quality, and not your normal run of the mill mindless horror flick.
The fact that the Hilton sisters got a run in this goes to show the quality, and as for disgracing the late Sam Kinisson, Bill Hicks will be waiting for you in hell.
Montgomery substitutes a gimmick for quality film-making.
The movie shows that you can still make good quality entertaining family movies!
It certainly seems to fit in nicely with the current Disney run of "cheapquels" being cranked out at furious pace to squeeze a few more dollars out of their "properties", quality be damned.
However it is clear that quantity can not bring quality into the scenes.
Sorely disappointed that Samuel L. Jackson would let his good name be associated with such a poor quality movie.
I don't even remember seeing Jimmy Breslin in this production, One redeeming quality was it actually was rather clean by todays standards and probably wouldn't have upset a church group.
The only redeeming quality in this film are the two female leads, they both provide nice eye candy.
While not quite attaining the quality of "Backbeat", it certainly gives one a feeling of growing up in Liverpool in the 1950s.
Although the pace of scenes may be a little slow for a modern audience, the quality of the dialog definitely makes up for it.
But what is curious about the movie, which is quite awful even by the widest margins of quality, is why the director insists on shooting the action sequences as if he was re-making Spielberg's SAVING PRIVATE RYAN.
Give it a little while to get going - it does spend some time to lay the ground work, but I don't really see a way to short cut it without losing the genuine and unassuming quality the director manages to preserve throughout the events that unfold.
Although he later went on to play this roguish character to perfection in films like Red Dust and Gone with the Wind, here it has a nasty quality that brings out a new side to his acting.
Basically, the film studios knew they had a good license here and wanted to milk it for all its worth, regardless of quality.
A quality film should evoke the thought process and possibly release repressed fears and anxieties.
BackNext